Search This Blog

Loading...

Saturday, November 07, 2009

How secular is Vande Mataram?







http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1601/16010940.htm

CONTROVERSY

How secular is Vande Mataram?

The Bharatiya Janata Party's attempt to make 'Vande Mataram', originally a song expressing Hindu nationalism, into an obligatory national song is unconstitutional.

A.G. NOORANI

UTTAR PRADESH Minister for Basic Education Ravindra Shukla declared on November 17 that "the order to make the singing of 'Vande Mataram' compulsory stands, and will be enforced". That the "order" would not cover schools run by the minority communities does not detract from its unconstitutional nature. It clearly violates Article 28 (1) and (3) of the Constitution. "(1) No religious instruction shall be provided in any educational institution wholly maintained out of state funds" and "(3) No person attending any educational institution recognised by the State or receiving aid out of State funds shall be required to take part in any religious instruction that may be imparted in such institution or to attend any religious worship that may be conducted in such institution or in any premises attached thereto unless such person or, if such person is a minor, his guardian has given his consent thereto." (emphasis added throughout). The language could not have been broader. It hits at the actual practice, regardless of a formal order and at attendance even if there is no participation in the worship.

What applies to Vande Mataram applies also to Saraswati Vandana, a hymn to the Goddess Saraswati. The Supreme Court's ruling that the singing of the National Anthem cannot be made obligatory applies both to Vande Mataram and Saraswati Vandana with yet greater force.

The U.P. Minister, who belongs to the Bharatiya Janata Party, revealed on November 17 that "the order" did exist and "will be enforced". But a few days later, on November 21, Union Home Minister L.K.Advani said that the "factual position" needed to be ascertained though he was against the singing of that song being made "mandatory". (Shukla has since been dropped from the Ministry.) More royalist than the BJP king, the Samata Party said on November 23: "Vande Mataram has no religious connotation". This is utterly false.

Else, in 1937 the Congress Working Committee would not have said: "The Committee recognise the validity of the objection raised by Muslim friends to certain parts of the song." It declared that "only the first two stanzas should be sung". A poem which needs surgical operation cannot command universal acceptance.

The song 'Vande Mataram' occurs in Bankimchandra Chatterjee's novel Anand Math published in 1882.

In his Autobiography of an Unknown Indian, Nirad C. Chaudhuri has aptly described the atmosphere of the times in which the song was written.1 "The historical romances of Bankim Chatterjee and Ramesh Chandra Dutt glorified Hindu rebellion against Muslim rule and showed the Muslims in a correspondingly poor light. Chatterjee was positively and fiercely anti-Muslim. We were eager readers of these romances and we readily absorbed their spirit."

R.C. Majumdar, the historian, has written an objective account of it.2 "During the long and arduous struggle for freedom from 1905 to 1947 'Bande Mataram' was the rallying cry of the patriotic sons of India, and thousands of them succumbed to the lathi blow of the British police or mounted the scaffold with 'Bande Mataram' on their lips. The central plot moves round a band of sanyasis, called santanas or children, who left their hearth and home and dedicated their lives to the cause of their motherland. They worshipped their motherland as the Goddess Kali;... This aspect of the Ananda Math and the imagery of Goddess Kali leave no doubt that Bankimchandra's nationalism was Hindu rather than Indian. This is made crystal clear from his other writings which contain passionate outbursts against the subjugation of India by the Muslims. From that day set the sun of our glory - that is the refrain of his essays and novels which not unoften contain adverse, and sometimes even irreverent, remarks against the Muslims" (emphasis added). As Majumdar pithily puts it, "Bankimchandra converted patriotism into religion and religion into patriotism."

The novel was not anti-British, either. In the last chapter, we find a supernatural figure persuading the leader of the sanyasis, Satyananda, to stop fighting. The dialogue that follows is interesting:3

"He: Your task is accomplished. The Muslim power is destroyed. There is nothing else for you to do. No good can come of needless slaughter.

"S: The Muslim power has indeed been destroyed, but the dominion of the Hindu has not yet been established. The British still hold Calcutta.

"He: Hindu dominion will not be established now. If you remain at your work, men will be killed to no purpose. Therefore come.

"S: (greatly pained) My lord, if Hindu dominion is not going to be established, who will rule? Will the Muslim kings return?

"He: No. The English will rule."

Satyananda protests, but is persuaded to lay down the sword.

"He: Your vow is fulfilled. You have brought fortune to your Mother. You have set up a British government. Give up your fighting. Let the people take to their ploughs. Let the earth be rich with harvest and the people rich with wealth.

"S: (weeping hot tears) I will make my Mother rich with harvest in the blood of her foes.

"He: Who is the foe? There are no foes now. The English are friends as well as rulers. And no one can defeat them in battle. (emphasis added).

"S: If that is so, I will kill myself before the image of my Mother.

"He: In ignorance? Come and know. There is a temple of the Mother in the Himalayas. I will show you her image there.

"So saying, He took Satyananda by the hand."

Anti-Muslim references are spread all over the work. Jivananda with sword in hand, at the gate of the temple, exhorts the children of Kali: "We have often thought to break up this bird's nest of Muslim rule, to pull down the city of the renegades and throw it into the river - to turn this pig-sty to ashes and make Mother earth free from evil again. Friends, that day has come."

The use of the song 'Vande Mataram' in the novel is not adventitious, and it is not only communal-minded Muslims who resent it because of its context and content. M.R.A. Baig's analysis of the novel and the song deserve attention. "Written as a story set in the period of the dissolution of the Moghul Empire, the hero of the novel, Bhavananda, is planning an armed rising against the Muslims of Bengal. While busy recruiting, he meets Mahendra and sings the song 'Bande Mataram' or 'Hail Mother'. The latter asks him the meaning of the words and Bhavananda, making a spirited answer, concludes with: 'Our religion is gone, our caste is gone, our honour is gone. Can the Hindus preserve their Hinduism unless these drunken Nereys (a term of contempt for Muslims) are driven away?'... Mahendra, however, not convinced, expresses reluctance to join the rebellion. He is, therefore, taken to the temple of Ananda Math and shown a huge image of four-armed Vishnu, with two decapitated and bloody heads in front, "Do you know who she is?" asks the priest in charge, pointing to an image on the lap of Vishnu, "She is the Mother. We are her children Say 'Bande Mataram'" He is taken to the image of Kali and then to that of Durga. On each occasion he is asked to recite 'Bande Mataram'. In another scene in the novel some people shouted 'kill, kill the Nereys'. Others shouted 'Bande Mataram' 'Will the day come when we shall break mosques and build temples on their sites? 4

The song has five stanzas. Of these only the first two are the "approved ones". Jawaharlal Nehru was 'opposed to the last two stanzas'. The approved stanzas read:

"I bow to thee, Mother, richly watered, richly fruited,

cool with the winds of the south,

dark with the crops of the harvests,

the Mother!

Her nights rejoicing in the glory of

the moonlight, her hands clothed

beautifully with her trees in flowering

bloom, sweet of laughter, sweet of

speech, the Mother, giver of boons

giver of bliss!

The third stanza refers to 'Thy dreadful name', evidently, a reference to the Goddess Kali. The fourth is in the same vein. 'Thou art Durga, Lady and Queen, with her hands that strike and her swords of sheen'.

It is essentially a religious homage to the country conceived as a deity, 'a form of worship' as Majumdar aptly called it. The motherland is "conceived as the Goddess Kali, the source of all power and glory."

This, in the song itself. The context makes it worse. "The land of Bengal, and by extension all of India, became identified with the female aspect of Hindu deity, and the result was a concept of divine Motherland".5 How secular is such a song? The objection was not confined to mere bowing and it was voiced early in the day.

In his presidential address at the Second Session of the All-India Muslim League held in Amritsar on December 30, 1908, Syed Ali Imam said:

"I cannot say what you think, but when I find the most advanced province of India put forward the sectarian cry of 'Bande Mataram' as the national cry, and the sectarian Rakhibandhan as a national observance, my heart is filled with despair and disappointment; and the suspicion that under the cloak of nationalism Hindu nationalism is preached in India becomes a conviction. Has the experiment tried by Akbar and Aurangzeb failed again? Has 50 years of the peaceful spread of English education given the country only a revival of denominationalism? Gentlemen, do not misunderstand me. I believe that the establishment of conferences, associations and corporate bodies in different communities on denominational lines is necessary to give expression to denominational views, so that the builders of a truly national life in the country may have before them the crystallised need and aspirations of all sects...

"Regard for the feelings and sentiments, needs and requirements of all is the key-note to true Indian nationalism. It is more imperative where the susceptibilities of the two great communities, Hindus and Musalmans, are involved. Unreconciled, one will be as great a drag on the wheel of national progress as the other. I ask the architects of Indian nationalism, both in Calcutta and Poona, do they expect the Musalmans of India to accept 'Bande Mataram' and the Sivaji celebration? The Mohammedans may be weak in anything you please, but they are not weak in cherishing their traditions of their glorious past. I pray the Congress leaders to put before the country such a programme of political advancement as does not demand the sacrifice of the feelings of the Hindu or the Mohammedan, the Parsee or the Christian."

The Congress Working Committee, which met in Calcutta on October 26, 1937, under the presidentship of Nehru, adopted a long statement on the subject.6 It asked that the song should "be considered apart from the book." Recalling its use in the preceding 30 years, the resolution said:

"The song and the words thus became symbols of national resistance to British Imperialism in Bengal especially, and generally in other parts of India. The words 'Bande Mataram' became a slogan of power which inspired our people and a greeting which ever remind us of our struggle for national freedom.

"Gradually the use of the first two stanzas of the song spread to other provinces and a certain national significance began to attach to them. The rest of the song was very seldom used, and is even now known by few persons. These two stanzas described in tender language the beauty of (the) motherland and the abundance of her gifts. There was absolutely nothing in them to which objection could be from the religious or any other point of view... The other stanzas of the song are little known and hardly ever sung. They contain certain allusions and a religious ideology which may not be in keeping with the ideology of other religious groups in India.

"The Committee recognise the validity of the objection raised by Muslim friends to certain parts of the song. While the Committee have taken note of such objection insofar as it has intrinsic value, the Committee wish to point out that the modern evolution of the use of the song as part of National life is of infinitely greater importance than its setting in a historical novel before the national movement had taken shape. Taking all things into consideration, therefore, the Committee recommend that, wherever Bande Mataram is sung at national gatherings, only the first two stanzas should be sung, with perfect freedom to the organisers to sing any other song of an unobjectionable character, in addition to, or in the place of, the Bande Mataram song."

'National' songs do not need political surgery; the songs which do, do not win national acceptance. Against this was the fact of history that, however ill-advised, the song had come to be associated with the struggle for freedom. Gandhi advised Muslims to appreciate its historic association but counselled against any imposition. "No doubt, every act... must be purely voluntary on the part of either partner," he said at Alipore on August 23, 1947.

THE Government of India acquired this emotion-charged legacy. Its stand was defined in a statement by Prime Minister Nehru to the Constituent Assembly (Legislative) on August 25, 1948:7 Nehru said:

"The question of having a national anthem tune, to be played by orchestras and bands became an urgent one for us immediately after 15th August 1947. It was as important as that of having a national flag. The 'Jana Gana Mana' tune, slightly varied, had been adopted as a national anthem by the Indian National Army in South-East Asia, and had subsequently attained a degree of popularity in India also... I wrote to all the provincial Governors and asked their views about our adopting 'Jana Gana Mana' or any other song as the national anthem. I asked them to consult their Premiers before replying... Every one of these Governors, except one (the Governor of the Central Provinces), signified their approval of 'Jana Gana Mana'. Thereupon the Cabinet considered the matter and came to the decision that provisionally 'Jana Gana Mana' should be used as the tune for the national anthem, till such time as the Constituent Assembly came to a final decision. Instructions were issued accordingly to the provincial governments...

''It is unfortunate that some kind of argument has arisen as between 'Vande Mataram' and 'Jana Gana Mana'. 'Vande Mataram' is obviously and indisputably the premier national song of India, with a great historical tradition, and intimately connected with our struggle for freedom. That position it is bound to retain and no other song can displace it. It represents the position and poignancy of that struggle, but perhaps not so much the culmination of it. In regard to the national anthem tune, it was felt that the tune was more important than the words... It seemed therefore that while 'Vande Mataram' should continue to be the national song par excellence in India, the national anthem tune should be that of 'Jana Gana Mana', the wording of 'Jana Gana Mana' to be suitably altered to fit in with the existing circumstances.

"The question has to be considered by the Constituent Assembly, and it is open to that Assembly to decide as it chooses. It may decide on a completely new song or tune, if such is available."

A MORE definitive statement was made by the President of the Constituent Assembly, Rajendra Prasad, on January 24, 1950. He said: "There is one matter which has been pending for discussion, namely, the question of the national anthem. At one time it was thought that the matter might be brought up before the House, and a decision taken by the House by way of a resolution. But it has been felt that, instead of taking a formal decision by means of a resolution, it is better if I make a statement with regard to the national anthem. Accordingly, I make this statement... The composition consisting of the words and music known as 'Jana Gana Mana' is the national anthem of India, subject to such alterations in the words as the Government may authorise as occasion arises; and the song 'Vande Mataram', which has played a historic part in the struggle for Indian freedom, shall be honoured equally with Jana Gana Mana and shall have equal status with it. (Applause) I hope that will satisfy the Members."8

Mutual understanding will lead to the Gandhian formula - respect for the song but no imposition. But even more than that, if the problem were understood in depth, what would emerge is a far better appreciation of the reasons why the Muslims and the Congress drifted away from each other. Those reasons have many a lesson for us today as we build a secular India. Attempts at imposition reflect a conscious decision to break with the national secular ideal.

REFERENCES

1. Jaico; page 235.

2. British Paramountcy and Indian Renaissance, Part II: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, 1965; page 478.

3. Sources of Indian Tradition compiled by William Theodore de Bary and others; Columbia University Press; 1958; page 715.

4. Vide his essay "The Partition of Bengal and its Aftermath; The Indian Journal of Political Science; Volume XXX, April-June 1969, Number 2, pages 120-122.

5. D.F.Smith: India as a Secular State; Princeton University Press; 1963; page 90

6. Indian Annual Register, 1937, Volume II, p. 327.

7. Official Report on "Constituent Assembly Debates"; Third session, Part I, Volume VI, August 9-31, 1948.

8. Constituent Assembly Debates, Volume XII; January 24, 1950.




__._,_.___


On the Web:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/indianmuslims/




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Friday, November 06, 2009

A BRIEF LIST OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION IN KARNATAKA

 
-----


A BRIEF LIST OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION & COMMUNAL INCIDENTS   IN KARNATAKA SINCE BJP GOVERMENT CAME TO POWER

( FROM JUNE 2008  TO SEPTEMBER 2009 )


The articles have been collected from various known  newspaper and web sources, if you want more details  just check the archives or google it.


June 10, 2008: Firing on farmers in Haveri
June 14, 2008: Padmapriya Karnataka legislator K. Raghupathi Bhat's wife killed
July 12, 2008: a group of men belonging to a hindu organisation place pig carcass at mosques in JC Nagar, area of the Bangalore city triggering communal violence.
August 10, 2008: Karnataka Rakshana Vedike takes law into there hands attacks a group of 35 people allegedly holding a 'rave party' at Manchanabele Dam.
August 14, 2008: State-owned Mahabaleshwara Temple in Gokarna transferred to Ramachandrapur Math, known for its save-the-cow campaigns.
August 29, 2008: The Public Instruction Department issues notices to all Christian institutions in the state to shut down to protest the violence against Christians in Orissa. Notice precursor to statewide attacks on churches.
24 August, 2008: A bus was intercepted at a prominent junction in Mangalore; a Hindu girl and her Muslim fiancée were dragged off the bus and assaulted.
8 August, 2008: Bajrang Dal activists stopped a bus in the city, and assaulted Syed, Zulfikar and Ameen, because these young boys helped a few girls with their bags,
September 14, 2008: With Mangalore as the epicentre, Sangh parivar activists attack Christian prayer halls and churches across the state. More churches attacked three days later
 October 26.2008: Illegal Detention of Muslim Youths
MANGALORE/CHIKMAGALUR: After ten days of illegal detention the police have released three persons they picked up for questioning from Kudregundi in Koppa taluk of Chikmagalur district.
The three were taken in on October 9 for questioning in connection with the ongoing investigation into suspected terrorist activities in the region. They were released late in the evening on October 20 after a civil rights group threatened to file a habeas corpus petition in the Karnataka High Court.
Until their release, nobody had a clue about their whereabouts.
Mohammed Yane Kunhimon (50) a scrap dealer and part-time civil works contractor, Abu Bakr (55) and his son Badruddin (25), both construction labourers, had been contracted to build a house by terror suspect Ahmed Bava, who is now in judicial custody. The house was raided a few days after the October 3 arrest of Ahmed Bava. The police claim to have recovered items such as a wooden bow, an automobile tool kit, a carpenter's tool kit and an electrical tool kit from the house.
Several attempts were made to speak to them in the days following their release, but to no avail. Finally, on Friday, Mr. Kunhimon and Mr. Badruddin spoke to HinduThe on the phone. They said that the police had treated them well.
However, Byatha N. Jagadeesh, an advocate working with the Bangalore-based Alternative Law Forum said, "For a period of ten days human liberty was suspended in favour of arbitrariness. The action of the police is not permitted by any law."
He said the victims could claim compensation for the illegal treatment meted out to them. However, generally "victims are only too happy to be left alone. The return to normalcy and not a fight for justice is their main objective." He pointed out that the habeas corpus provision is rarely invoked by families of victims, either out of fear or because the police have a tendency to give constant assurances that they will release the prisoners soon. A few hours before they were released on October 20, HinduThe met the family of the three men in Kudregundi. With their breadwinners in jail, the families were in a pathetic state. It was already evening and Mr. Badruddin's three children had eaten only a meagre breakfast.
"I had kanhi (rice gruel)," said his daughter. When she was asked what she had for lunch she looked toward her mother whose eyes welled up with tears.
Not allowed to work
Mr. Kunhimon's nephew Moideen (25), who was the sole bread earner for his family in the absence of his uncle, was capable of working but was not allowed to. A plumber by profession, Mr. Moideen was barred from using his tools by the police. Pointing to a rusted pile of screwdrivers, cutting-pliers and hinges, he said, "The police have asked me not to touch them. Maybe they think that I might use them to make a bomb."
October 16, 2008: The largest-selling Kannada newspaper claims on its front page that conversions have gone up alarmingly after Sonia Gandhi-Congress came to power. Debates the issue on its Op-Ed page for over a month.
October 30, 2008: Bajrang Dal activists attack two undertrials in Mangalore district sub jail; sixth such attack after its chief Mahendra Kumar's arrest on September 20.
December 12, 2008: Aggressive posturing at Baba Budangiri by parivar leaders and Hindu pontiffs, an attempt to create communal tension.
December 27, 2008: Hoysala Sene takes law into their own hands, attacks Fuga bar in Bangalore and alleges illegal activities.
December 28, 2008: Bajrang Dal activists attack a bus ferrying students on a study tour to Mysore, saying girls and boys from different religions can't travel together.
December 28, 2008:Ours is Brahmins Govt:BJP's Ramchandre Gowda a cabinet minister given a statement in a  program.
January 3,2009: Cases against Bajarang Dal to be dropped  
11 cases against those involved in Dattapeeta issue to be withdrawn
BANGALORE: The State Government on Friday decided to withdraw criminal cases filed against the activists of Bajrang Dal and other Hindutva organisations for their alleged involvement in the Dattapeetha/Bababudangiri issue in Chickmaglur district.
Briefing reporters about the decisions taken by the state Cabinet, Rural Development and Panchayatraj Minister Shobha Karandlaje said that 11 cases filed against them would be withdrawn.
January 6, 2009: B.V. Seetharam, editor of Mangalore-based newspaper Karavali Ale, who followed a strong anti-parivar editorial line, handcuffed and arrested in alleged extortion case. Prior to his arrest, parivar elements vandalise paper's office.
 
January 7, 2009: Laddoos distributed in some schools across the state on Vaikunta Ekadashi. Congress demands biriyani should be distributed on Ramzan.
January 19, 2009: An arrested dacoit reportedly confesses links with radical Hindu groups and admits to carrying out the Hubli district court bombing before the May assembly elections
January 25, 2009: Sri Rama Sene activists attack pub in Mangalore,  Molest and beat up young helpless girls.TV Cameras were installed in pub before the attacks
January 25, 2009:  in the Balmatta area of Mangalore, Sri Rama Sene activists attacked a house where women from non-Hindu communities were invited for a party.
January 29, 2009: a large group of students, led by Mr. Gobbalathadka, barged in demanding that Muslim girls stop wearing the burkha even on their way to and from the college. The demand created a furore dividing committee members, according to college principal, Balasubramaniam. Soon, hundreds of activists entered the venue and physically attacked Muslim committee members and Hindus who opposed their demands. Following the incident, Mr. Gobbalathadka and his followers were arrested and remanded in judicial custody.
January 30.2009: Rashtriya Hindu Sena chief Pramod Muthalik, now facing the heat for his support to the January 24 Mangalore pub attack, openly advocates militancy. On January 17, 2008, while addressing a rally in Udupi, Muthalik said: "It's time for blasts. Malegaon is just a trailer. Every house should have a person like Pragya Singh. Every housewife will carry bombs now.''
Feb 6, 2009: Shruti a 2nd year Pre-University student of St Aloysius College, Mangalore (and daughter of C.K. Kunhambu, CPI(M) MLA from Kerala), along with a Muslim friend Shabeeb, were dragged out of a private bus at Pumpwell and forced into an auto rickshaw by Hindutva goons, who warned Shruti not to talk to non-Hindus as they are 'inhuman'.
Feb,8,2009:Since May 2008, there have been "14 recorded incidents of violence" against Hindu girls for been seen with Muslim or Christian boys.
Chief Minister BS Yediyurappa brazenly said there has been no "major law and order problem" and Home Minister VS Acharya criticised the public outrage as "hype" and "fuss when no deaths have occurred."
In August 2007, when Mr Yediyurappa was Deputy Chief Minister in the JD(S)-led government, he dropped as many as 51 cases against sangh parivar activists, including Mutalik.
 
Feb 9,2009: The anti-terrorism campaign was initiated by the BJP government to spread awareness among students about the menace. According to the Congress, the ruling party, in the guise of the campaign, is actually trying to poison the minds of students against minority communities and saffronise the campuses
 
 
February 11,2009: 16-year-old Ashwini, daughter of Mr Jayamoolya Elinge of Mulky (near Mangalore) committed suicide following public humiliation by the Hindutva forces for walking on a street with a Muslim boy.
 
Feb 19,2009: Cabinet grants 6 acres of land to Janaseva trust of RSS(out skirts of Bangalore)
 
Feb 19,2009:  Attack on Farmers in Bellary by police.
 
Feb 26,2009:  30 member group attack two muslim students aged 15 and 17 in puttur.
 
Feb 26,2009:  a group of five persons harassed a girl and a boy while they were talking at a juice centre here yesterday.
 
Feb 26,2009:  Women in Bangalore were attacked  in Indranagar, Brigade Road, Koramangala and the Mount Carmel college area, women have been assaulted for being dressed in western attire. The first incident occurred on February 6 at the posh Brigade Road, where a group of girls were allegedly attacked by a gang of men, for wearing western clothes and smoking on the street.
The men allegedly abused the women and then beat them up. An e-mail highlighting the incident adds that when the women asked a nearby policeman for help, he advised them to wait for the arrival of the police van.
These girls later lodged a complaint at the local police station.
A similar attack was reported at Indranagar on February 17, when a girl traveling back home from her German class was attacked by a group of men. The men followed her on a bike and blocked her way. They abused her in Kannada, and when she retaliated by slapping one of them, he punched her in the face.
The third incident was reported at Koramangala, where a 28-year-old woman was allegedly assaulted by a group of men, who thought she was part of the 'pink chaddi' campaign.
In another incident near the Mount Carmel College, a young filmmaker was attacked by a group of men, who told her that she deserved the assault for daring to wear jeans and a sleeveless kurta.
 
 
Feb 27 , 2009: Take that - 130 Crores for temples and mutts
"There are no rains and food production has fallen due to the sins committed by various people in the past. I believe in God. I have allocated money so that Gods will be pleased and shower mercy on us.'' - B S Yeddyurappa

March 1, 2009:  Karnataka Govt Grants worth Rs 60 crores for religious outfits

Rs 60-cr largesse for faith


BANGALORE: With an eye on the coming Lok Sabha elections, Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa has doled out grants worth over Rs 50 crore for the development of various religious institutions and places of importance for different sects of people, besides announcing a grant of Rs 10 crore for places spreading religious harmony.

Unmindful of the criticism by the Opposition for his soft corner for religious institutions, BSY has given them the goodies. "Sincere efforts will be made to bind different religions and castes with love and affection by formulating constructive programmes," the CM announced in his budget speech.

Institutions and places chosen for the grants for spreading religious harmony are: Khaja Aminuddin Dargah (Bijapur), Shirahatti Fakiraswamy Mutt (Gadag Dist), Kodekal Basavanna and Tinthani Mauneswara of Surpur (Gulbarga), Savalgi Shivalingeswara Mutt of Gokak (Belgaum), Murugamalla Kshetra of Chintamani (Kolar) and other places of Hindu-Muslim and Hindu-Christian amity.

Yeddyurappa has earmarked Rs 10 crore for Kaginele, the birth place of saint Kanakadasa, while announcing a Rs 50-crore plan to develop Renuka Yellamma temple at Saudat t i in Belgaum. An amount of Rs 5 crore has been kept aside for the coming year for the Kaginele projects.

Other religious places and institutions chosen for grants include: Yediyuru Siddalingeshwara Mutt (Rs 5 crore), Malemahadeshwara Betta, Biligirirangana Betta and Himavad Gopalaswamy Betta (Rs 5 crore), Melukote (Rs 2 crore), Chandragutti and Shivanapada (Rs 2 crore each), Jidaga Mutt in Gulbarga ( Rs 1 crore), Sharanabasaveshwara Gurupeetha of Bovi community in Bagalkot, Immadi Siddarameshwara Mutt and Hampi Hemakoot Gayatri Mutt (Rs 1 crore each), Kumaraswamy Mutt at Hangal and Shivayogi Mandir in Bagalkot (Rs 1 crore each), Babbuswamy Mutt in Udupi (Rs 1 crore) and Rajanahalli Valmiki Gurupeetha in Davanagere (Rs 2 crore).
 
 March 3, 2009:  ABVP imposes ban on wearing burkhas in rural college in Karnataka.  Once the ban was formalised by the college authorities, a groups of boys took it upon themselves to impose it. "Every day, the boys sit at the tea stall near the college gate. If we take even one step into the college gate with the burkha on, they start scolding us," said a 16-year-old class 10 student.
Mar 3, 2009  PANJA VILLAGE/SULLIA TALUK,: Muslim girls of the Government Composite Pre-University College here have been banned from wearing the burkha by local Hindutva outfits and the Bharatiya Janata Party-affiliated Akhil Bharathiya Vidyarthi Parishad.
According to Lakshmisha Gobbalathadka, the self-proclaimed architect of the ban, the idea was first proposed to the college authorities at his behest by a few students affiliated to the ABVP in early January this year.
First step
"Four of my boys spoke to the college principal and demanded that Muslim girls should be banned from wearing burkhas in classrooms," said Gobbalathadka, who is also the district convener of a fringe outfit called Hindu Jagarana Vedike.
Avoiding trouble
"We agreed immediately. We did not want any trouble," said a college official. But soon the demands began to grow.
Emboldened by the support the boys of his group received from a section of students, they went on to extend the burkha ban across the entire 28-acre campus.
Formalised
Once the ban was formalised by the college authorities, groups of boys took it upon themselves to impose it. "Every day, the boys sit at the tea stall near the college gate. If we take even one step into the college gate with the burkha on, they start scolding us," said a 16-year-old class 10 student.
Violence on campus
Meanwhile, another controversy broke out on the campus after the ABVP alleged that a Muslim boy had made a proposal of marriage to a Hindu girl.
Beaten up
"Our boys beat up the Muslim boy on February 28," claimed Mr. Gobbalathadka.
At the college's development committee meeting on January 29, a large group of students, led by Mr. Gobbalathadka, barged in demanding that Muslim girls should stop wearing the burkha even on their way to and from the college.
The demand created a furore dividing committee members, according to college principal, Balasubramaniam. Soon, hundr eds of activists entered the venue and physically attacked Muslim committee members and Hindus who opposed their demands. Following the incident, Mr. Gobbalathadka and his followers were arrested and remanded in judicial custody.
Growing support
"Many others have been inspired by the success we have had here. Soon, this campaign will spread to all government colleges in the region," Mr. Gobbalathadka told The Hindu.
He added that the garment would soon be banned from public spaces in the entire village of Panja.
'How can they?'
Said Panja gram panchayat president Rafique, who sustained injuries during the January 29 violence, said: "Some may feel that the burkha is a symbol of oppression of women. Even if that is true, a resistance to the garment should come from within the community. How can we tolerate somebody using force to ban the burkha?"
Reacting to the issue, Deputy Director of Public Instruction C. Chame Gowda told The Hindu, "The college authorities might have agreed to the ban under pressure. But there is no law that prevents the burkha. Everybody has the right to practice their religious beliefs as long as it does not inconvenience others."
Concerned
Deputy Commissioner V. Ponnuraj expressed concern over the developments and said he was still inquiring into the issue. "The rule of law and the Constitution will prevail," he said.
 
March 9, 2009:  Surathkal police assaulted woman, Zohra (35) and her daughter Busra (19) alleged that  when they tried to prevent the police from arresting Mohammed, Zohra's husband at their house in Krishnapura on Sunday.
 
March 11, 2009: Tension in Sira; eight shops burnt down  
RSS activist held; police platoons deployed

 
Sira tense for fourth time in 45 days
RSS blames Congress for unrest
 
TUMKUR: There was tension in Sira town in Tumkur district on Tuesday following the burning down of eight shops near the bus stand. The police arrested an activist of the Rashtreeya Swayamsevak Sangh in this connection.
This is the fourth time during the last 45 days that Sira town has seen tension due to communal clashes. A Shobha Yatra taken out by the Sangh Parivar was attacked in the Kote Extension on January 23. A Hindu Jagriti Samavesh on February 20 witnessed protests and on February 24, stones were thrown at a mosque and two shops injuring two women.
The police said that two automobile shops, a painting outlet and three banana trading houses were among the shops burnt down. The police gave the name of the person arrested as Shivu (26), resident of Channan Kunte, near Sira town. He was produced before a court which remanded him in judicial custody.
Deputy Commissioner C. Somasekhara and Superintendent of Police Harsha P.S. are camping in the town. T.B. Jayachandra, Congress MLA from Sira, visited the spot. He appealed to the people to maintain peace. Three platoons of the State Reserve Police have been deployed.
S.N. Jayapal, RSS leader, said the police had assaulted Mr. Shivu after they arrested him. He said: "The shops are in the Muslim dominated area and no Hindu activist can be expected to move around in the night there, leave alone commit any crime".
Mr. Jayapal demanded a high-level inquiry into the incident and said: "We have brought it to the notice of the Home Minister V.S. Acharya. We are ready even if the State could entrust it (the inquiry) to the CBI."
"We will file a complaint before the State Human Rights Commission against the police for arresting our youth activist without valid proof," he said. He alleged that the Congress was behind the continued unrest in Sira town.
He said: "In the last peace committee meeting, it was agreed upon that the Hindus will celebrate the Holi on Tuesday and the Muslims will celebrate the Id on Thursday. However, the police failed to enforce it."
BJP activists in Baindur, near Udupi. They have blocked installation of Chaplin's statue saying it would hurt Hindu sentiment.
The statue was being put up by Karnataka film director Hemant Hegde for the shoot of his movie `Housefull' and was meant for a song sequence. Hegde said he had obtained all the clearances and had discussed the shoot with the officials. "I had apprised the gram panchayat and the Udupi deputy commissioner. The BJP activists questioned me as to why I was not installing Vivekananda's statue," he said. He said he planned to shift the shoot elsewhere.
 
March 17, 2009:  Unidentified miscreants damaged furniture, lights and fans of a Jumma Masjid at Madikal near Uppunda in Kundapur taluk on Sunday night. Madikal is nearly 60 km from Udupi.
 
March 17, 2009:   Three time MP Mr. Ananth Kumar Hegde said  that he would prevent a minority community from taking out processions in Uttara Kannada district. He is reported to have said that he had 63 criminal cases against him and he was not afraid of one more being slapped on him. Mr. Hegde is also reported to having that he did not need a single minority vote to win the elections.
March 18,  2009:  Communal twist to moral policing in Puttur
MANGALORE Prohibitory orders were clamped in Puttur from Tuesday evening, after an act of moral policing triggered violent clashes between two communities.Police resorted to lathicharge to disperse the mob which went on a stoning spree, targeting the police station, shops, establishments, vehicles and a KSRT C bus. An eerie calm descended on Puttur, as shops and other establishments downed shutters fearing further escalation of violence.Police sources told The New Indian Express that students from Franklin Institute of Air Hostess Training in Mangalore as part of an academic exercise had visited PU colleges in Puttur and Sullia. Once such batch of students, including Rishal, Vishwas, Rohan, Kavya and Zeena completed the assignment and boarded a bus to Mangalore.At about 4.30 pm, over 50 Bajrang Dal activists stopped SM Travels bus at Bolvar and dragged the three boys out.They were beaten up and handed over to the Puttur police by the activists.Agitated members of the KFD mistaking the boys to be Muslims gathered in front of Puttur Town police station and began arguing with the Sangh Parivar activists.The heated arguments soon erupted into clashes as members from both communities rained blows on each other from the KSRT C bus stand to Mayur Theatre. A KSRTC bus and a car were pelted with stones. Police who resorted to caning, summoned additional forces from Mangalore to quell the violence.Puttur bandh today: Close on the heels of the clashes, the Sangh Parivar in Puttur called for a Puttur bandh on Wednesday. Party sources told The New Indian Express that the BJP has extended support to the bandh.
March 19,  2009: Attempt to set fire to madrassa
Udupi, September 28: Some unidentified persons allegedly attempted to set fire to the Noorul Islam Madrassa at Parampalli-Padukere, coming under the Kota police station limits in Udupi district. 

The Kota police said on Wednesday that the president of the madrassa, Bhasha Sahib, had lodged a complaint at the police station stating that he was sleeping in a room next to the madrassa on Tuesday night, while the teacher, Maulvi Umarul Farook Charmady, was sleeping inside the madrassa with two students. 

When Charmady opened the door of the madrassa at around 4 am, he found that the door had been blackened by fire. A bottle half-filled with petrol was found nearby. A case has been registered. Security has been provided to the madrassa, the police said. 

Asked when the miscreants might have attempted to set fire to the madrassa, the Kota police said that the incident could have taken place between 8.30 pm on Tuesday and 4 am on Wednesday. 

The Additional Superintendent of Police of Udupi district, Kashinath Talkeri, also confirmed the incident and said that investigations were going on.

Speaking over the telephone, Charmady said that a window of the madrassa had also been blackened from the fire. Charmady said, "Our madrassa has only one entrance. The miscreants wanted to finish us off," he said. 

"We have been saved by the grace of Allah. If the door had caught fire, there would have been no means of escape for us. We are frightened by the incident," he added.





May 2,  2009: Students dig out info under RTI Act
CM's temple visits cost Rs 11 lakh
Chief Minister B S Yeddyurappa has paid eight official visits to temples during the first few months of his tenure at a cost of Rs 11 lakh to the public exchequer.
This revelation figured among the four major findings student journalists of Indian Institute of Journalism and New Media have gathered by making use of the Right to Information Act.  

Briefing the media on Thursday, the students alleged that government departments were reluctant to give complete information though they were legally bound to do so under the Act. 

Charging the CM's office with being 'most uncooperative' with the requests, students said that they were shunted between different officials for 72 times by 18 officers to gather the requisite information. BMTC fires only ten percent of its drivers who had caused fatal accidents and the rest get back to work, a fact that has come to light through RTI. 

The students had to file three applications before the authorities responded. 

"BMTC has quietly recycled their most deadly drivers responsible for nearly 370 fatal collisions since 2000. In the case of 28 drivers, they caused a second and even a third accident before they were fired," the students said. 
Government school teachers go on leave for years without being removed from the rolls, another RTI application to the Department of Public Instruction revealed. 

Lokayukta received praise from the students for being most co-operative. However, the flip side was that less than one percent of the corruption cases booked by Lokayukta culminated with convictions
May 5 , 2009: Irregularities in renovation of residences of ministers karnataka
May 23, 2009:Two Muslim youths attacked
Mangalore police initially dismissed them as 'minor incidents'
 
MANGALORE: Two Muslim youths were attacked with lethal weapons by extremists allegedly belonging to some fringe Hindutva outfits on Thursday evening.
Preliminary investigations by the police have ruled out any coordination between the two attacks which are believed to be communally motivated.
The first incident occurred at about 9.30 p.m. at Adyar Padavu on the outskirts of Mangalore. The victim, Umar Farook (22), who is recuperating in a private hospital, told The Hindu he was accosted by four persons near his house.
After surrounding him, one of the four assailants struck him with a "sword". The weapon caused lacerations on his back. The Mangalore Rural Police Sub Inspector Prakash dismissed it as a "minor incident". He said the prime accused Annu alias Pradeep picked up a quarrel with his relative and Mr. Farook tried to stop the quarrel.
"Pradeep actually wanted to strike his relative with the weapon but Farook came in the way and got injured," he said and added: "It (the attack on Farook) was unintentional."
However, Mr. Farook alleged that the attack was planned and communally motivated.
"The prime accused is a member of the Sri Rama Sene," he alleged. Superintendent of Police A.S. Rao said: "We will go with the version of the victim."
Gang attacks
The second incident occurred at about 11.30 p.m. in the Marnamikatta area of the city. The victim, Mohammed Ashraf (27), has suffered serious injuries and is being treated at a private hospital. He told The Hindu that a 10-member gang of alleged Bajrang Dal activists surrounded him when he opened the gates of his house.
Each of the assailants was armed with a knife, a metal weapon used by gangsters to punch their victims and a few beer bottles, he said.
"I passed out with the first blow to the back of my head with a bottle," he said. According to Mr. Ashraf, the assailants had been heckling him for the last two months.
"They would ask me why I dress so stylishly or demand to know where I got the money to buy my car, motorcycle, wristwatch and mobile phone," he said.
This is the second time the same gang is attacking a member of this family. A similar case was registered with the Pandeshwar police a year ago.
Mr. Ashraf's younger brother Mohammed Irfan (now 19) was beaten up by the gang that usually congregates at a general store near the house of the victim. "No arrests were made in that case," said Mr. Ashraf.
Mr. Ashraf and his family were about to shift their residence to a safe locality. "We have had enough of this daily harassment and were about to leave anyway. Our family has stayed in this locality for 55 years. But it is just not safe any more. We feel like refugees," an emotional Mr. Ashraf said.
A case has been registered with the Pandeshwar (Mangalore North) police station.
June, 2009 : Withdrawal of several cases pending before various courts against the associates of Reddy ministers including the destruction of 200 year old historical Sunkalamma Devi temple near Oblapuram
July 4, 2009 : Mysore communal riots start after pig carcass were found in Mosques that were placed by Ram Sena activists.
July 16,  2009: Rama Sene activists assault guest at wedding reception in Mangalore
MANGALORE: Sri Rama Sene activists allegedly assaulted a Muslim youth for attending a Hindu wedding reception in a restaurant here on Wednesday.
Those who rushed to the rescue of the 30-year-old guest were also roughed up.
Claiming responsibility for the attack, Madhu Urwastore, convener of the district unit of the Sri Rama Sene, told The Hindu that he (the Muslim guest) had no business attending a Hindu reception. "He was also misbehaving and getting close to women… so our boys beat him up and those who came to his rescue," Mr. Urwastore said.
The staff of the restaurant said that other than the newly married couple, there were 15 guests, including children. "It was a normal family affair and they seemed to be enjoying the party," a staffer said.
The waiter who was serving the guests said, "Suddenly, two men wearing saffron scarves entered the restaurant and asked the bearded man [Muslim guest] to vacate the place." The waiter said that this warning was met with resistance from the other guests, and with help from restaurant's staff, they made the two intruders leave.
Meanwhile, about 70 Sri Rama Sene activists were staging a demonstration in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office near the restaurant. They were protesting against Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Assembly Siddaramaiah's recent comments against Sene chief Pramod Muthalik.
The restaurant manager said that the two activists returned with those who were demonstrating in front of the Deputy Commissioner's office complex. "We requested the activists to settle the matter outside," he added.
Once outside, the activists began to assault the Muslim youth, said one of the staffers of the restaurant. Presspersons, who were there, said that the attack bore some resemblance to the infamous pub attack.
No action taken
A police officer attached to the Pandeshwar station said, "It all happened too quickly for us to react. But we managed to shift the guests to a safe place." However, no action had been taken against the assailants, he added.
Superintendent of Police A.S. Rao said the police did not receive any complaint from the victims. "In the absence of the complaint, we cannot file a case of assault," he said.
July 30, 2009 : Hanakona lathi charge
August 4, 2009 : Withdrawal of criminal cases in election against Reddy brothers
Aug 19, 2009 :  Burqa Ban in Mangalore College by ABVP Activists
Government college in Uppinangady buckles on burqa issue after students protest



Notice will be served on the principal of Sri Venkatramana Swamy (SVS) College in Bantwal, which restricted a Muslim girl from entering into the classroom wearing headscarf, said Deputy Commissioner V Ponnuraj.


After receiving complaint from Aysha Ashmin, first year BCom student of the college, Ponnuraj said that report will be sought from the college and a letter will be sent to the government. "I will ask the government to issue directions to the college in connection with the incident. Measures will be taken to ensure personal freedom within the campus and also for  building confidence among students," he added.

SP Dr A Subramanyeshwar Rao, who was present at the DC Office, promised that all measures will be taken to ensure peace in the region. Aysha Ashmin, who was accompanied by her father B Mohammed, explained her woes to the deputy commissioner and SP.

Principal's version
SVS College Principal Dr Seetharam Mayya told reporters here that there is an 'organisation' which put pressure on students to demand ban on headscarf and burqa inside the campus.

However, he refused to mention the name of the organisation which put pressure on them. "If we allow a Muslim girl to wear headscarf inside classes, tomorrow they will demand a place to perform 'namaz' on the campus. Hence, we are going to introduce a dress code inside the college," he said at a press meet.

When asked about the legality of banning headscarf and burqa in the college, Mayya said, "We will have to verify it."

To a question, he said that the institute will also restrict 'Ayyappa vrithadharis' from wearing black dhotis and shawls once the dress code was introduced.
In another development, a government college in Uppinangady in the district has allowed Muslim students to wear burqa (hijab) on the campus when they staged protest opposing the restriction.

About 50 Muslim students in the Government First Grade College in Uppinangady were protesting against the college's decision on restricting girls from wearing burqa in the college for the past two days. But the issue has been solved amicably by the college authorities and girls were allowed to wear burqa in the college on Wednesday.
'Minor incident'

Meanwhile, Higher Education Minister Aravind Limbavali refused to comment on the incident saying, "It is a minor incident. In London if Indians are found wearing scarf they will be asked to remove it.  A section of the media is blowing the issue out of proportion," he said.
Aug 24, 2009: SHRC issues notice to State govt on burqa ban
'All educational institutions are bound by the Constitution of India. No institution can curtail the right of the students,' said State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) chairman Justice S R Nayak.


Aysha Ashmin. file PhotoAddressing media persons here on Monday, Nayak said the Commission has taken note of the incidents of ban on head scarf and burqa in two colleges in the district and sent a notice to the government seeking action taken report.

Referring to the incidents of head scarf ban in SVS College, Bantwal and burqa ban in Government College, Uppinangady, Nayak said the religious practices should be regarded as 'matters of religion'.

"The religious freedom guaranteed under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution embraces not only merely matters of doctrine and belief pertaining to the religion, but also practice of it," Nayak said adding that an individual school management cannot impose restrictions violating the Articles 25 and 26.

"After closely examining and monitoring the situation in undivided Dakshina Kannada district, it is the considered opinion of the Commission that social harmony in the region is fragile in nature and can be disturbed at any time by a lightest incite or provocation.

Therefore, it is the utmost duty of the State to see that peace prevails and harmony is maintained in the region by undertaking all possible means and measures," Nayak said.
He said that notices were sent to the Additional Secretary and Principal Secretary to the Home Ministry, Principal Secretary to the Collegiate Education Department, Western Range IGP and Dakshina Kannada district DC seeking reply before October 29.

Further he said notice also has been sent to the State Chief Secretary, Western Range IGP and Dakshina Kannada district DC taking suo motu cognisance of the report appeared in the media with regard to the moral policing in the region.

"Unless the state authorities, particularly the law enforcing authorities, nip these in the bud, there is likelihood of these forces engulfing the entire coastal belt and the state resulting in upsurge of violence," he noted.

Aug 24, 2009:  'Govt not willing to empower SHRC'

"Government is not willing to empower the SHRC because of an anticipation that it may turn against it. Those who are in power know that it will be troublesome for them if the SHRC functions properly in the state," Justice S R Nayak noted.

Nayak said that the post of an IGP in the Investigation Wing of SHRC remains vacant since July 10. No appointment was made after IGP Bipin Gopalakrishna was transferred from the post, Nayak said adding that the government did not pay heed to the letters sent by the SHRC in this regard.

Nayak said that neither Chief Minister nor Home Minister speak even when the number of custodial deaths and most heinous and barbarous atrocities are increasing in police stations across the state. He said that he had recommended the government to hand over the custodial death case of RT Nagar Police Station and torture case of Amrithahalli Police Station to CBI.

Aug 25, 2009: Moral police rears its head again
BANGALORE: Two incidents against women, one violent and one verbally abusive, signal yet another worrying trend of moral policing or "outsider" bashing. The victims of both the incidents — that took place over the last week —are theatre and film actors from Mumbai, and this has clearly dented their impression of a city they thought was safe.
Rachel, an actor who works with The Company Theatre in Mumbai, got off a bus from Chennai at the Silk Board Junction on August 16, when she noticed two men pull over on a bike. Before she knew it, one of them began to hit her from the back, yelling abuses.
Indifferent public
"I turned around, and the man was still in attack mode," she says. "He was abusing me in Kannada," adds a shaken Ms. Rachel. Though there were people all around, nobody came forward to help her or even enquire what provoked the outburst.
Though she didn't fully understand what her attacker was saying, Ms. Rachel got the drift: he called her an outsider and said something about her clothes. "I was wearing jeans and a kurta," she says. Taken aback by this violent action, she called out to two of her friends, who had accompanied her on the bus but had walked ahead after disembarking. "I did not engage with the men, because they seemed too aggressive to handle," she says. "There was no police person at the junction for me to talk to," she says, adding that she did not file an FIR.
"He was not drunk or intoxicated; in fact he seemed fully in his senses," adds Ms. Rachel. "I have been to Bangalore many times before and after the last spate of attacks I thought things had changed."
False accusation
A few days later, something along the same lines took place with actor Kalki Koechlin, who starred in Dev D. She also works with The Company Theatre and was here for the performance of The Skeleton Woman. "I was dropping a friend off in Whitefield and we stopped at a traffic signal when a man got out of the car yelling that I had bumped his car," says Ms. Koechlin. "I was pretty sure that I had not; and there was no scratch either."
Soon after, five other men came out of the car and insisted that she pay them Rs. 2,000 for the 'accident'. "It seemed staged, and they had become really aggressive and were shouting in Kannada." She does not speak the language but she identified the words used in English such as "outsider" and "mad driver".
"Luckily there was a traffic policeman who came and helped. He saw that there was no scratch on the car," says Ms. Koechlin.
"He spoke to the men, but we did not stay back to hear," she said.
Atul Kumar who runs The Company Theatre in Mumbai, who is also in Bangalore on work, was stunned by the two incidents. "We were beginning to build a relationship with the city and bringing more plays from Mumbai," he says. "These incidents have really shocked us."
 
Sep 1, 2009:  Court orders release of 25 detainees
BANGALORE: The Karnataka High Court on Monday ordered the release of 25 who were arrested by the Mysore police in connection with the clashes at Kyathamaranahalli, in Mysore last month.
A Division Bench comprising Justice Manjula Chellur and Justice Jawed Rahim passed the order on habeas corpus petitions by the relatives of those arrested.
Taking severe exception to the manner in which the authorities had flouted provisions of law and kept the prisoners in illegal detention, the Bench said though there was a body warrant against the prisoners, their remand had not been extended. Moreover, they had not been produced before the jurisdictional magistrate for extending their remand.
The Bench ordered to send the court order of release to the Jail Superintendent of Belgaum jail.
 
Sep 2, 2009 :  Hubli court blast accused succumbs
 
The main accused in Hubli court blast case, Nagaraj Jambagi (24), died at Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS) here on Wednesday. He was admitted to the KIMS for treatment one-and-half-month ago after his associates had attacked him with lethal weapons in Bagalkot jail.


Jambagi, who received serious injuries in his head and on his face, was kept in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), initially. He was later shifted to the prisoners' ward a week ago.

He was facing charges of masterminding Hubli court blast and placing bomb under Venkatapur bridge, near Dharwad. Besides, he was also accused of killing an oil trader in Bijapur and  kidnapping the son of a leading politician in Bagalkot. His associates Basavaraj Roogi, Ramesh Pawar and Basavaraj Diggi had attacked him in Bagalkot jail on July 18 after quarrelling with him over a petty reason.  Jambagi, who was in unconscious state, was brought to KIMS for treatment. He remained unconscious till his death.

Resident of Heggur plot in Bilagi taluk of Bagalkot district, Jambagi along with his associates had involved in several grave offenses like bomb blast, homicide, extortion and other extremist activities.

The police had achieved a breakthrough in the Hubli court blast case after arresting Jambagi and his associates. They were kept in Bagalkot jail.

Sep 9, 2009 : Circular slammed for 'saffron' agenda
Government, aided schools told to purchase
300 books
59,000 primary schools in State will have to buy the books
Bangalore: A circular, sent by the Government to all government and aided schools, asking them to buy 300 books published by the Rashtrotthana Sahitya Parishat, has created apprehensions among certain sections of the academic community. They feel the Bharatiya Janata Party Government is attempting to push a "saffronisation" agenda in primary education.
The circular, dated August 14, gives a list of 300 monographs under the title "Bharata Bharati", which include both historical and mythical figures, are to be bought by the schools. The circular also states that money for the purchase — amounting to Rs. 17 crore — has to be drawn from the MLA's Local Area Development fund. There are about 59,000 primary schools in Karnataka which will have to be provided these books.
'Communal agenda'
Students' Federation of India (SFI) has described this as an attempt by the BJP Government to "use educational institutions as centres for communal agenda".
B. Rajashekara Murthy, State Secretary of SFI, said: "The Government should have formed a committee of educational experts and come out with a list of books that inculcate a scientific and progressive spirit among children." Books of Kannada Sahitya Prishat, Kannada Pustaka Pradhikara and other publishers could have been picked rather than those published by "one publication which is part of the Sangh Parivar," he said.
The organisation is holding a series of protests demanding withdrawal of the order.
All India Democratic Students' Organisation (AIDSO) has said that while it is important to educate children on historical personalities, the Karnataka Government's choice of publisher "gives rise to suspicions". AIDSO has called upon teachers, educationists and parents to protest the move.
Sep 10, 2009: Vandals attack church near Bangalore
Miscreants vandalise church in Hebbagodi
Staff Reporter
Statues of Jesus, Mary pulled down; window panes broken
 
Caretaker's room locked from outside
Attempt was made to set a car on fire
BANGALORE: Unidentified miscreants vandalised the St. Francis De Sales Church in Hebbagodi, off Hosur Road, early on Thursday morning, desecrating two statues placed in a grotto and damaging window panes.
"Some people came around 2.30 a.m. and first brought down the statues of Mother Mary and Jesus. Later they broke the glass panes of about 40 windows," said parish priest Father Aloysius.
The church is situated on a big campus that also houses a school and a college. The vandalism first came to the notice of Arul, a caretaker, who was sleeping in a room adjoining the entrance to the campus. "Someone locked my room from outside and I heard the sounds of the statues being brought down and glass shattering," he said.
Screams for help
Arul said he shouted for help, calling out to people working in a new building coming up on the premises. They let him out and he rushed to the priest's residence to alert him. "We went around the damaged part of the church. An attempt was also made to set a car on fire," Father Aloysius said.
Senior police officials visited the spot. Superintendent of Police (Bangalore Rural) B.A. Mahesh said: "A stick or rod has been used to break the glass panes. The miscreants did not enter the church." The Hebbagodi police have registered a case.
This Catholic church, named after the Saint Francis, was established over four decades ago. "We belong to the Missionaries of St. Francis, which has been in existence for nearly 150 years. We are catering to the education, health and other needs of people in rural areas," Father Aloysius said.
 

Sep 12, 2009: Buses, shops attacked during Belgaum bandh

Belgaum: The bandh called on Friday by the Sri Rama Sene and other pro-Hindu organizations in Belgaum, turned violent — four shops were burnt, two persons injured in stone-throwing, and at least 15 NWKRTC buses damaged. The bandh, called to protest the violence in Maharashtra during the Ganesh festival, met with a good response in the city. Schools, colleges, business establishments and theatres were shut, while buses and autos stayed off the roads.
    Early in the morning, miscreants set four shops on fire on Fort Road — a cushion shop belonging to Ashfaq Badgaonkar, an electric shop of Irshad Peerwale, Narayan Pujari's tea canteen and Zarin Ahmad Shaikh's puncture shop.
    Trouble began with stones being thrown on buses and autos on Thursday night. There was panic among the people, and 15 buses were damaged. "Three buses were badly damaged," said N Sangappa, divisional controller, NWKRTC. "The corporation has lost Rs 12 lakh of business in the bandh."
    A student, Supreet Shankarappa Maninagar, 21, on his way to VTU to attend counselling in an auto, was seriously injured by a stone thrown by two miscreants on a two-wheeler. He had come from Munchkandi village in Bagalkot district, and has been admitted to KLE Prabhakar Kore Hospital. Truck driver Ninganagouda Shankargouda Goudar, 24, of Savadatti taluk, was also injured in the stone pelting, and admitted to hospital.

 
Sep 20 , 2009: 74 died in rain-related incidents since June in  Karnataka:Karunakar Reddy
Sep 29:  BJP training its leaders on communal violence'
'BJP training its leaders on communal violence'
Bangalore, Sep 28, dhns:

By inviting Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi to conduct a workshop for the State ministers at Suttur, the BJP is training them in stirring communal violence, KPCC President R V Deshpande alleged on Tuesday.



"If the BJP really wants to give some orientation to the ministers, it could have invited intellectuals and experts. Instead, it wants Modi to conduct the workshop on disturbing peace in society...," he told reporters and added that the Suttur kshetra was a holy place, which RSS was misusing to further its agenda.

He also criticised the CM for urging farmers to let the Government install meters to  their IP sets. "BJP has failed to supply power to farmers, though  it had promised to provide free power before 2008 elections," he said.
 




Thursday, November 05, 2009

Intrest Free Banking -Abdul Rahman's interview in Frontline Magazine

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 10:20 PM
Subject: Intrest Free Banking -Abdul Rahman's interview in Frontline Magazine



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: abdul rahman <rahmanexec@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:58 PM
Subject: Intrest Free Banking -Abdul Rahman's interview in Frontline Magazine

 

Inclusive banking

PURNIMA S. TRIPATHI

The government is considering the demand for Shariah-compliant banking, which has gained support from a wide spectrum of political parties.

K. GOPINATHAN

Stalls put up by banks near the Common Entrance Test cell for engineering admission in Bangalore. Muslims in India have a disproportionately small presence in banking activity.

MUSLIMS constitute over 15 per cent of the population in India but they hold only 12 per cent of the accounts in the 27 public sector banks as far as priority sector advances are concerned. The share of other minority communities, which form roughly 6 per cent of the population, is 8 per cent. This is the average for the period between March 31, 2001, and March 31, 2005. Statistics available for the same period with regard to priority sector lending by the 29 private sector banks reveal that Muslims held over 11 per cent of the accounts, while the other minorities held 10.5 per cent.

The figures become even more disappointing in the 44 minority-dominated districts in the country. Muslims, who form over 33 per cent of the population there, hold only 21 per cent of all public sector bank accounts, while other minorities, who form only 2 per cent of the population, hold 5 per cent of all accounts. In the private sector banks, Muslims hold over 20 per cent of all accounts, while other minorities hold 15 per cent.

These are figures painstakingly compiled by the Sachar Committee, which studied the socio-economic conditions of Muslims in India vis-a-vis other minority communities.

The committee's report has established beyond doubt that a huge section of the Muslim population has been left out of the ambit of banking services for various reasons. In its chapter titled "Access to bank credit", it has shown clearly that the access of Muslims to formal banking facilities is much lower than that of other minorities, and this is true for both private and public sector banks. In its detailed analysis, the committee has noted that "the percentage share of accounts, total amount outstanding and amount outstanding per account of Muslims remains disappointing".

The committee has summed up its findings thus: "The access of Muslims to bank credit, including priority sector advances, is low and inadequate. The average size of credit is also meagre and low compared with other socio-religious communities both in public sector and private sector banks. The position is similar with respect to finances from specialised institutions like the SIDBI and NABARD. Census 2001 data show that the percentage of households availing themselves of banking facilities is much lower in villages where the share of Muslim population is high…. The financial exclusion of Muslims has far-reaching implications for their socio-economic and educational uplift."

This financial exclusion could be because of a certain mindset prevailing in the banking sector, which has categorised Muslims and Muslim-dominated areas as "negative zones" (this is documented in the Sachar report), and also for reasons of faith.

Real economic issues

For the first time a debate over real economic issues concerning the Muslim community is taking place and a demand is gradually emerging that the government should take specific measures to introduce Shariah-compliant banking products so that a vast section of Muslims who fail to access banking services for reasons of faith can avail themselves of these services and improve their lot. The demand for what is popularly called Islamic banking, which is essentially interest-free banking, has started emerging from within the community. A forum of Muslim intellectuals, parliamentarians and bankers and Islamic scholars, called the Indian Centre for Islamic Finance (ICIF), is spearheading the demand, which is slowly taking the shape of a popular movement.

The fact that Muslims are being left out of the ambit of banking services has been spelt out in the Raghuram Rajan Committee report on financial sector reforms, which is considered the most comprehensive report of its kind so far.

In his report submitted to the Government of India in 2006, Raghuram Rajan, former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has observed that "certain faiths prohibit the use of financial instrument that pays interest. The non-availability of interest-free banking products results in some Indians, including those in the economically disadvantaged strata of society, not being able to access banking products and services due to reasons of faith."

What this actually means is that a vast section of the Muslim population in India simply does not approach banks because no interest-free banking product is available at present, and giving or receiving interest is prohibited in Islam.

"If interest-free banking can be introduced in India, it will revolutionise the economic scenario, unleashing massive financial resources, which are at present lying dormant because of the non-availability of a suitable environment," says H. Abdur Raqeeb, convener of the national committee on Islamic banking of the ICIF. What, however, is interesting about this banking practice is that it is open to all, irrespective of faith, and in the present high-interest rate regime, if financing is available without the burden of the ever-increasing interest rates, it will be welcomed by all, advocates of the concept argue.

Obviously, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government did see some merit in this argument and is actively working on evolving such a model, in conjunction with the Reserve Bank of India. In the RBI, there is already a strong opinion in favour of allowing such a mechanism. A report published in the April-June 2005 issue of RBI Legal News and Views outlines the fact that interest-free banking is an attractive proposition gaining currency all over the world and so it was time India introduced it.

The report describes the existing situation in India in these words: "It is reported that in India thousands of crores earned in interest is kept in suspended accounts as believers do not claim it. The assets controlled by Muslims are estimated to be $1.5 trillion and growing at 15 per cent a year. In Kerala alone, it is reported that this money could be above Rs.40,000 crore. Research reveals that a handsome bulk of money in India owned by believers is lying idle, which, if invested in profit-sharing basis and utilised properly, can have a major impact on the Indian economy." The report further points out that such banking can be initiated in India through a single window in some banks.

The UPA government, in keeping with its policy of inclusive growth, took the initiative in 2005 and asked the RBI to explore ways to introduce Islamic banking in India.

The RBI appointed a committee headed by Anand Sinha, Chief General Manager, Department of Banking Operations and Development. The committee examined the issue in detail and came to the conclusion that in view of the current statutory and regulatory framework it would not be feasible for banks in India to undertake Islamic banking activities or for branches of Indian banks abroad to undertake Islamic banking outside India. It submitted its report in 2006.

In the wake of this report, there has been a growing demand from the Muslim community for amending the Banking Regulation Act. An ICIF delegation called on RBI Deputy Governor Dr K.C. Chakroborty on September 11, 2009, and submitted a memorandum demanding the introduction of Shariah-compliant banking practices in India, pointing out that "if London, Singapore, Tokyo and Hong Kong can become the hub and home of Islamic finance and banking, why not Mumbai and Cochin [Kochi]?"

It now appears that Islamic banking could become a reality. A senior RBI official told Frontline: "Yes, we are taking a look at this proposal along with various other proposals. We are in the midst of consideration for bringing in comprehensive reforms in the financial sector and will consider all proposals in front of us." Significantly, the Indian Banks' Association (IBA), the representative body of all public sector banks, has already expressed itself in favour of this concept.

At an international conference on participatory banking held in August 2007, former IBA Chairman M.B.N. Rao said, "Islamic banking is an idea whose time has come. The IBA will study the concept, but will wait for the regulatory framework by the RBI to run it."

Alternative model

If Muslim parliamentarians and other Islamic banking scholars are to be believed, this regulatory framework is in the offing. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh personally favours this concept and has asked the Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Rehman Khan, who has been advocating the concept, to mobilise other Members of Parliament in favour of Islamic banking and suggest measures for implementing it. Rehman Khan constituted a group of MPs, which reiterated that the Islamic banking concept could be introduced in India without cumbersome changes in the law. The group presented an alternative model to the Prime Minister as a test case before such full-fledged banking is started. This model, based on Tabung Haji of Malaysia, is basically about setting up an institution to manage the Hajj.

The committee, which was headed by Rehman Khan himself, suggested in its report submitted to the Prime Minister in January 2006 that an institution where Muslims can park their savings could be set up in India. The institution, in turn, would provide them services for performing the Hajj and invest the surplus money in other projects as per the rules laid down in the Shariah.

The committee also recommended that once such an institution was set up, the government should withdraw the Hajj subsidy, which in any case is not appreciated by devout Muslims as performing the Hajj with government dole is considered unIslamic.

Highlighting the benefits of such an institution, the report said: "The present structure of the Hajj Committee will not permit to undertake this function. The proposal is to create an institution on the lines of Tabung Haji, which can mobilise the savings of prospective Hajj pilgrims and invest in projects and instruments which are permissible in Shariah. It can also invest in infrastructure for the Hajj travel, like purchasing or leasing aircraft, accommodation for pilgrims both in India and Saudi Arabia, negotiate and make long-term arrangement for chartering of aircraft at economical fares."

A measure of the interest shown by the Prime Minister towards this concept is evident from the fact that he constituted a committee of Secretaries, headed by the Cabinet Secretary, to look into the suggestions. This committee is yet to submit its report.

According to Rehman Khan, "this institution can be set up as a test case and if it succeeds, then full-fledged Islamic banking can be introduced". He says Islamic banking has tremendous potential in India as even modest calculations show that the country has 180 million Muslims.

"If the proposed institution targets even 10 per cent of the population it can reach over 15 million investors and, on an average, if saving per investor is around Rs.25,000, then it can aim to mobilise savings to the extent of over Rs.30,000 crore in the course of three to five years. This can change the face of the minority community in India. If a tiny country like Malaysia, which has a 15 million Muslim population, can try and succeed in this, why can't we?" he says. He told Frontline that the majority of parliamentarians and even clerics with whom he had interacted had approved of the proposal and it was only a matter of time before the Prime Minister took it up with him.

At another level, a group of Lok Sabha members are mobilising MPs to seek their support in getting a Bill passed in the winter session of Parliament. Asaduddin Owaisi of the All-India Majlis-E-Ittehadul-Muslimeen (MIM) will bring in a private member's Bill in this connection. "I have spoken to a whole lot of people cutting across party lines and there is massive support for such a move," he told this correspondent. "Why should we look at this from the prism of Islam, why not look at it as an alternative mode of banking for which there is a massive need," he said.

He said he was aware of the fact that in many savings accounts held by Muslims the interest money is lying defunct as receiving interest is considered haraam [forbidden] in the Shariah. "Why should we not do something to mobilise this dormant resource?" he asks, adding that Islamic banking has become a runaway success even in non-Islamic countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States and is functioning well in Malaysia, Singapore, Japan and Indonesia.

Abdul Rehman, a Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) MP from Vellore and a former banker, says the issue must not be linked with Islam as essentially it is all about introducing interest-free banking (as in the case of mutual funds), which has additional benefits as it can cater to the specific needs of Muslims as well. "This kind of banking is not at all religion-specific because non-Muslims constitute the majority of customers in such banks in other countries." What this can achieve, he says, is that it will save gullible Muslim customers who park their money with not-so-credible non-banking institutions. "If the government gives the legislative sanction for such an institution, then Muslims will not only be able to put their savings in safe accounts but also be able to take loans for various purposes [based not on interest but on profit/risk sharing basis] and improve their socio-economic lot."

"Though no specific amount can be pointed out for the country as a whole, yet it is a fact that thousands of crores of rupees is lying in suspended accounts in banks across India, unclaimed for reasons of faith. If only the government did something to unlock this money, the face of the minority community in India will change for ever," says Abdur Raqeeb. Facilitating such an institution will not only unlock dormant money in India but open the doors to massive investment from abroad as well, he says.

According to unconfirmed estimates, over $40 trillion from oil-rich Gulf countries is waiting to be invested in India post-9/11. "Post-9/11 oil money has stopped being invested in the U.S. and is looking for a safe investment destination and India could well be that destination, given its safe economic scenario, huge market and good growth rate," says Abdur Raqeeb, quoting from a report by GRAIL Research, a U.S. market intelligence and data analysis provider. The report says that "India has the potential of emerging a significant market for Islamic banking provided there is a favourable change in the regulatory environment and increased awareness among Muslims and India as a whole".

With parties such as the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Samajwadi Party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal, the Nationalist Congress Party and the DMK having already expressed their support for Islamic banking, the concept could materialise earlier than imagined.

 



--- On Wed, 10/7/09, Abdur Raqeeb <abdraqeeb@gmail.com> wrote:


From: Abdur Raqeeb <abdraqeeb@gmail.com>
Subject: Inclusive Banking -your interview in Frontline
To: rahmank@hotmail.com, asadowaisi@hotmail.com, asadowaisi@rediffmail.com, rahmanexec@yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, October 7, 2009, 10:40 AM

 
 
Please click and see your interview in frontline.
Kindly give your feedback
 
H Abdur Raqeeb




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "imantimes" group.
To post to this group, send email to imantimes@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
imantimes+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/imantimes?hl=en?hl=en

Pl. VISIT www.imandubai.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Saturday, October 31, 2009

Jafar ibn Abi Talib (R.A)

 


Jafar ibn Abi Talib

Courtesy of ISL Software


In spite of his noble standing among the Quraysh, Abu Talib, an uncle of the Prophet, was quite poor. He had a large family and did not have enough means to support them adequately. His poverty-stricken situation became much worse when a severe drought hit the Arabian peninsula. The drought destroyed vegetation and livestock and, it is said, people were driven to eat bones in the struggle for survival.

It was during this time of drought, before his call to prophethood, that Muhammad said to his uncle, al Abbas: "Your brother, Abu Talib, has a large family. People as you see have been afflicted by this severe drought and are facing starvation. Let us go to Abu Talib and take over responsibility for some of his family. It will take one of his sons and you can taken another and we will look after them."

"What you suggest is certainly righteous and commendable," replied al-Abbas, and together they went to Abu Talib and said to him: "We want to ease some of the burden of your family until such time as this distressing period has gone." Abu Talib agreed.

"If you allow me to keep Aqeel (one of his sons older than Ali), then you may do whatever you like ," he said.

It was in this way that Muhammad took Ali into his household and al-Abbas took Jafar into his. Jafar had a very close resemblance to the Prophet. It is said there were five men from the Hashim clan who resembled the Prophet so much, they were often mistaken for him. They were: Abu Sufyan ibn al-Harith and Qutham ibn al-Abbas both of whom were cousins of his. As-Saib ibn Ubayd, the grandfather of Imam ash Shafi: al-Hasan ibn Ali, the grandson of the Prophet, who resembled him most of all; and Jafar ibn Abi Talib.

Jafar stayed with his uncle, al-Abbas, until he was a young man. Then he married Asma bint Umays, a sister of Maymunah who was later to become a wife of the Prophet. After his marriage, Jafar went to live on his own. He and his wife were among the first persons to accept Islam. He became a Muslim at the hands of Abu Bakr as-Siddiq, may God be pleased with him.

The young Jafar and his wife were devoted followers of Islam. They bore the harsh treatment and the persecution of the Quraysh with patience and steadfastness because they both realized that the road to Paradise was strewn with thorns and paved with pain and hardship.

The Quraysh made life intolerable for them both and for their brethren in faith. They tried to obstruct them from observing or performing the duties and rites of Islam. They prevented them from tasting the full sweetness of worship undisturbed. The Quraysh waylaid them at every turn and severely restricted their freedom of movement.

Jafar eventually went to the Prophet, peace be upon him, and sought permission for himself and a small group of the Sahabah, including his wife, to make hijrah to the land of Abyssinia. With great sadness, the Prophet gave his permission. It pained him that these pure and righteous souls should be forced to leave their homes and the familiar and cherished scenes and memories of their childhood and youth, not for any crime but only because they said, "Our Lord is One. Allah is our Lord."

The group of Muhajirin left Makkah bound for the land of Abyssinia. Leading them was Jafar ibn Abi Talib. Soon they settled down in this new land under the care and protection of the Negus, the just and righteous ruler of Abyssinia. For the first time since they became Muslims, they savoured the taste of freedom and security and enjoyed the sweetness of worship undisturbed.

When the Quraysh learnt of the departure of the small group of Muslims and the peaceful life they enjoyed under the protection of the Negus, they made plans to secure their extradition and their return to the great prison that was Makkah. They sent two of their most formidable men, Amr ibn al-Aas and Abdullah ibn Abi Rabiah, to accomplish this task and loaded them with valuable and much sought after presents for the Negus and his bishops.

In Abyssinia, the two Quraysh emissaries first presented their girls to the bishops and to each of them they said: "There are some wicked young people moving about freely in the King's land. They have attacked the religion of their forefathers and caused disunity among their people. When we speak to the King about them, advise him to surrender them to us without his asking them about their religion. The respected leaders of their own people are more aware of them and know better what they believe."

The bishops agreed.

Amr and Abdullah then went to the Negus himself and presented him with gifts which he greatly admired. They said to him: "O King, there is a group of evil persons from among our youth who have escaped to your kingdom. They practice a religion which neither we nor you know. They have forsaken our religion and have not entered into your religion. The respected leaders of their people - from among their own parents and uncles and from their own clans - have sent us to you to request you to return them. They know best what trouble they have caused."

The Negus looked towards his bishops who said: "They speak the truth, O King. Their own people know them better and are better acquainted with what they have done. Send them back so that they themselves might judge them."

The Negus was quite angry with this suggestion and said: "No. By God, I won't surrender them to anyone until I myself call them and question them about what they have been accused. If what these two men have said is true, then I will hand them over to you. If however it is not so, then I shall protect them so long as they desire to remain under my protection."

The Negus then summoned the Muslims to meet him. Before going, they consulted with one another as a group and agreed that Jafar ibn Abi Talib and no one else should speak on their behalf.

In the court of the Negus, the bishops, dressed in green surplises and impressive headgear, were seated on his right and on his left. The Qurayshite emissaries were also seated when the Muslims entered and took their seats. The Negus turned to them and asked:

"What is this religion which you have introduced for yourself and which has served to cut you off from the religion of your people? You also did not enter my religion nor the religion of any other community."

Jafar ibn Abi Talib then advanced and made a speech that was moving and eloquent and which is still one of the most compelling descriptions of Islam, the appeal of the noble Prophet and the condition of Makkan society at the time. He said: "O King, we were a people in a state of ignorance and immorality, worshipping idols and eating the flesh of dead animals, committing all sorts of abomination and shameful deeds, breaking the ties of kinship, treating guests badly and the strong among us exploited the weak. "We remained in this state until Allah sent us a Prophet, one of our own people whose lineage, truthfulness, trustworthiness and integrity were well-known to us. "He called us to worship Allah alone and to renounce the stones and the idols which we and our ancestors used to worship besides Allah.

"He commanded us to speak the truth, to honor our promises, to be kind to our relations, to be helpful to our neighbors, to cease all forbidden acts, to abstain from bloodshed, to avoid obscenities and false witness, not to appropriate an orphan's property nor slander chaste women.

"He ordered us to worship Allah alone and not to associate anything with him, to uphold Salat, to give Zakat and fast in the month of Ramadan.

"We believed in him and what he brought to us from Allah and we follow him in what he has asked us to do and we keep away from what he forbade us from doing.

"Thereupon, O King, our people attacked us, visited the severest punishment on us to make us renounce our religion and take us back to the old immorality and the worship of idols.

"They oppressed us, made life intolerable for us and obstructed us from observing our religion. So we left for your country, choosing you before anyone else, desiring your protection and hoping to live in Justice and in peace m your midst."

The Negus was impressed and was eager to hear more. He asked Jafar: "Do you have with you something of what your

Prophet brought concerning God?" "Yes," replied Jafar.

"Then read it to me," requested the Negus. Jafar, in his rich, melodious voice recited for him the first portion of Surah Maryam which deals with the story of Jesus and his mother Mary.

On hearing the words of the Quran, the Negus was moved to tears. To the Muslims, he said: "The message of your Prophet and that of Jesus came from the same source..." To Amr and his companion, he said:" Go. For, by God, I will never surrender them to you." That, however, was not the end of the matter. The wily Amr made up his mind to go to the King the following day "to mention something about the Muslims belief which will certainly fill his heart with anger and make him detest them" On the morrow, Amr went to the Negus and said:

"O King, these people to whom you have given refuge and whom you protect say something terrible about Jesus the son of Mary (that he is a slave). Send for them and ask them what they say about him."

The Negus summoned the Muslims once more and Jafar acted as their spokesman. The Negus put the question: "What do you say about Jesus, the son of Mary?"

"Regarding him, we only say what has been revealed to our Prophet ," replied Jaffar. "And what is that?" enquired the Negus.

"Our Prophet says that Jesus is the servant of God and His Prophet. His spirit and His word which He cast into Mary the Virgin."

The Negus was obviously excited by this reply and exclaimed: "By God, Jesus the son of Mary was exactly as your Prophet has described him"

The bishops around the Negus grunted in disgust at what they had heard and were reprimanded by the Negus. He turned to the Muslims and said:

"Go, for you are safe and secure. Whoever obstructs you will pay for it and whoever opposes you will be punished. For, by God, I would rather not have a mountain of gold than that anyone of you should come to any harm."

Turning to Amr and his companion, he instructed his attendants: "Return their gifts to these two men. I have no need of them." Amr and his companion left broken and frustrated. The Muslims stayed on in the land of the Negus who proved to be most generous and kind to his guests.

Jafar and his wife Asma spent about ten years in Abyssinia which became a second home for them. There, Asma gave birth to three children whom they named Abdullah, Muhammad and Awn. Their second child was possibly the first child in the history of the Muslim Ummah to be given the name Muhammad after the noble Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace.

In the seventh year of the hijrah, Jafar and his family left Abyssinia with a group of Muslims and headed for Madinah. When they arrived the Prophet was just returning from the successful conquest of Khaybar. He was so overjoyed at meeting Jafar that he said: "I do not know what fills me with more happiness, the conquest of Khaybar or the coming of Jafar."

Muslims in general and the poor among them especially were just as happy with the return of Jafar as the Prophet was. Jafar quickly became known as a person who was much concerned for the welfare of the poor and indigent. For this he was nicknamed, the "Father of the Poor". Abu Hurayrah said of him: "The best of men towards us indigent folk was Jafar ibn Abi Talib. He would pass by us on his way home and give us whatever food he had. Even if his own food had run out, he would send us a pot in which he had placed some butterfat and nothing more. We would open it and lick it clean..."

Jafar's stay in Madinah was not long. At the beginning of the eighth year of the hijrah, the Prophet mobilized an army to confront Byzantine forces in Syria because one of his emissaries who had gone in peace had been treacherously killed by a Byzantine governor. He appointed Zayd ibn Harithah as commander of the army and gave the following instructions: "If Zayd is wounded or killed, Jafar ibn Abi Talib would take over the command. If Jafar is killed or wounded, then your commander would be Abdullah ibn Rawahah. If Abdullah ibn Rawahah is killed, then let the Muslims choose for themselves a commander."

The Prophet had never given such instructions to an army before and the Muslims took this as an indication that he expected the battle to be tough and that they would even suffer major losses.

When the Muslim army reached Mutah, a small village situated among hills in Jordan, they discovered that the Byzantines had amassed a hundred thousand men backed up by a massive number of Christian Arabs from the tribes of Lakhm, Judham, Qudaah and others. The Muslim army only numbered three thousand.

Despite the great odds against them, the Muslim forces engaged the Byzantines in battle. Zayd ibn al-Harithah, the beloved companion of the Prophet, was among the first to fall. Jafar ibn Abi Talib then assumed command. Mounted on his ruddy-complexioned horse, he penetrated deep into the Byzantine ranks. As he spurred his horse on, he called out: "How wonderful is Paradise as it draws near! How pleasant and cool is its drink! Punishment for the Byzantines is not far away!" Jafar continued to fight vigorously but was eventually slain. The third in command, Abdullah ibn Rawahah, also fell. Khalid ibn al-Walid, the inveterate fighter who had recently accepted Islam, was then chosen as the commander. He made a tactical withdrawal, redeployed the Muslims and renewed the attack from several directions. Eventually, the bulk of the Byzantine forces fled in disarray.

The news of the death of his three commanders reached the Prophet in Madinah. The pain and grief he felt was intense. He went to Jafar's house and met his wife Asma. She was getting ready to receive her absent husband. She had prepared dough and bathed and clothed the children. Asma said: "When the Messenger of God approached us, I saw a veil of sadness shrouding his noble face and I became very apprehensive. But I did not dare ask him about Jafar for fear that I would hear some unpleasant news. He greeted and asked, 'Where are Jaffar's children?' I called them for him and they came and crowded around him happily, each one wanting to claim him for himself. He leaned over and hugged them while tears flowed from his eyes.

'O Messenger of God,' I asked, 'why do you cry? Have you heard anything about Jafar and his two companions?'

'Yes,' he replied. 'They have attained martyrdom.' The smiles and the laughter vanished from the faces of the little children when they heard their mother crying and wailing. Women came and gathered around Asma.

"O Asma," said the Prophet, "don't say anything objectionable and don't beat your breast." He then prayed to God to protect and sustain the family of Jafar and assured them that he had attained Paradise.

The Prophet left Asma's house and went to his daughter Fatimah who was also weeping. To her, he said: "For such as Jafar, you can (easily) cry yourself to death. Prepare food for Jafar's family for today they are beside themselves with grief."

[ Great Muslims  ] [ Home ]   [ Site Map ]




__._,_.___

Monday, October 26, 2009

Hazrat Usman bin 'Affaan:The Third Caliph of Islam


 

Hazrat Usman bin 'Affaan


The Third Caliph of Islam

 

By Prof. Fazl Ahmad

 

Early Life


May Allah be the guardian of the couple! After Lot, Usman is the first man who, with his wife, has given up the comfort of his home for the cause of Allah."

Thus said the Holy Prophet when his son-in-law, Usman, left Mecca for Abyssinia, to excape persecution at the hands of the Meccans.
Usman was born some six years after the birth of the Holy Prophet. His father's name was Affan. Arwa was the name of his mother. His grandaughter, Baiza, was a daughter of Abdul Muttalib and therefore an aunt of the Holy Prophet. Usman belonged to the Omayya branch of the Quraish. Banu Omayya were thought to be the equals of Banu Hashim. The national flag of the Quraish was in their keeping.
When Usman grew up, he became a cloth merchant. His business grew rapidly and he came to be looked upon as a top business man of the city. He often visited Syria in connection with his business. Flourishing business brought him both wealth and position.
However, Usman was an extremely kindhearted man. He looked upon wealth as a means of helping others. If money could remove suffering, Usman was always ready to help.
 

Acceptance of Islam


It was Abu Bakr who won Usman for Islam. He and Usman were great friends. The Holy Prophet belonged to Banu Hashim and Usman belonged to Banu Omayya. There was old rivalry between the two tribes. This did not keep back Usman from accepting the truth. As soon as he heard the message of Islam, he accepted it. He was one of the first Muslims. The Holy Prophet gave to him his daughter, Ruaqayya in marriage.

By becoming a Muslim, Usman drew upon himself the anger of his relatives. His uncle, Hakam, tied his hand and foot. He then shut him up in a dark room. Usman gladly underwent all kinds of torture, but refused to give up Islam.
The Quraish who once loved Usman now became his enemies. His own relatives would have nothing to do with him. This made Usman feel miserable. He went to the Holy Prophet and asked permission to go to Abyssinia. The permission was given. Usman was the first Muslim to leave for Abyssinia. He and his wife crossed the Red Sea and sought refuge in Abyssinia. They were the first to give up their home and all they had for the cause of Allah.
When migration from Mecca began, Usman and his wife Ruqayya also went to Medina and settled there.
 

Closeness to the Prophet


Usman was among those who were very close to the Holy Prophet. He fought by the side of the Prophet in all battles except Badr. He could not go to Badr because his wife, Ruqayya, was very ill. The Prophet himself told Usman to stay back at Medina and attend to his ailing wife. Ruaqayya died of this illness.

Usman took the death of Ruqayya very much to heart. He was all the more sad because he no longer enjoyed the honor of being the son-in-law of the Prophet. The Holy Prophet saw this. So he married to Usman his second daughter, Umm Kulthum. This was a rare honor. It earned for Usman the title of "Zun-Noorain," or "the possesor of two lights."
In the sixth year of Hijra was signed the treaty of Hudaibiya. Usman played an important part in the peace talks. It was he who was sent by the Holy Prophet to contact the Quraish. The Quraish said they had no objection if Usman alone visited the Kaaba, but they were unwilling to let the Messenger of Allah enter Mecca. To this Usman replied: "It is unthinkable that I take preference over the Prophet. If he can't visit the House of Allah, I too, will not visit it." Usman's firm stand at last forced the Quraish to yield ground.
In the meantime, a rumor got afoot. It was given out that Usman had been killed by the Quraish. The report shocked the Prophet. He determined to avenge the death of Usman. He stood under a tree and took a pledge from his followers. He struck his hand on each man's hand and the man said, "I will fight unto death for the sake of Usman."
Such was the regard in which Usman was held by the Prophet! However, the rumor proved to be untrue. Usman came back safe and sound.
When the Muslim refugees first came to Medina, they had great difficulty in getting drinking water. There was just one well but it was owned by a Jew. The Jew would not allow the refuges to get water from it. So the holy Prophet said, "who is there that will buy this well for the Muslims? Allah will reward him a fountain in Paradise." Usman at once responded. He brought the well for twenty thousand dirhams and gave it away for the free use of Muslims.
When the Muslims grew in numbers, the Prophet's Mosque became too small for them. The holy Prophet said, "Who will spend money for the extension of the mosque?" Usman again came forward. He bought the adjoining piece of land for the extension.
In the ninth year of Hijra, reports reached the Holy Prophet that the Emperor of Byzantium was preparing a march on Medina. These reports disturbed the Muslims. The Holy Prophet began to counter preparations. He appealed to people to give whatever they could. Usman gave one thousand camels, fifty horses and one thousand pieces of gold. The holy Prophet looked at the heap of gold and declared, "Whatever Usman does, from this day on, will do him no harm."
Usman was one of the scribes of the Prophet. He was one of the men who wrote portions of the Qur'an as they were revealed. He was also one of the ten Companions whom the holy Prophet gave the good news of the kingdom of Heaven.
Closeness to the Prophet won Usman a high place among the Companions. He was one of the advisors of Abu Bakr and Omar during their Caliphate.
 

Usman's Election


Omar had nominated a six-man council to choose a Caliph from among its members. These members were: Ali, Usman, Abdur Rehman bin Auf, Saad bin Abi Waqaas, Zubair bin Awwam and Talha bin Obaidullah. The electors were to meet and finish their task within three days of Omar's death. Such was the will of the late Calpih.

The electors met. Talha had been out of Medina for some days, so he could not attend the meeting.
The council of electors had a long sitting. It could not come to an agreed decision. There was an impasse. So Abdur Rehman bin Auf said, "If any man is willing to withdraw his name, he will have the right to nominate the Caliph. Who will withdraw?" All kept silent. Then Abdur Rehman said, "I withdraw my name."
All except Ali said they were ready to accept Abdur Rehman's decision. Abdur Rehman asked Ali what he had to say. He replied, "Promise to be just. Promise not to be partial on account of kinship. Promise to be led by the welfare of the people alone. If you promise these things, I agree to abide by your decision."
Abdur Rehman promised all these things. The election of the Caliph now rested with Abdur Rehman bin Auf.
Abdur Rehman was fully alive to the heavy responsibility he had placed upon himself. The news of Omar's death had drawn to Medina the leaders of public opinion from all over the empire. Abdur Rehman went to each one of them and held long talks. The Banu Hashim were for Ali. All others favored Usman. Other candidates were out of the picture.
Abdur Rehman now talked to the two likely candidates.
 

"Who do you think is the fittest person after you?" he asked Ali.

"Usman," was the reply.

 

He put Usman the same question and he named Ali.

At last the third night came. In the morning Abdur Rehman was to announce his decision. He sat up whole night, holding long talks with the other four members of the council. He made a last effort to get a unanimous decision. But he failed in this effort. The differences between Banu Hashim and Banu Omiyyah could not be patched up. At last the call to the morning prayer brought these talks to an end.
When the prayer was over, people in the mosque were all ears to hear what Abdur Rehman had to say.
Abdur Rehman stood up. For some minutes he prayed to Allah to guide his thoughts. Then he said, "O people," I have given my best thought to the matter. I have talked to different people and got their opinion. I hope you will not differ with my decision."
Then Abdur Rehman called Usman and said, "Promise that you will act according to the commandments of the Qur'an and the example set by the Holy Prophet and his two Caliphs."
"I promise to do that to the best of my knowledge and ability," declared Usman.
Thereupon Abdur Rehman bin Auf pledged loyalty to Usman. His example was followed by all present. Ali also pledged loyalt to the new Caliph. Usman became the third Caliph of Islam.
 

First Address


When the pledge was over, Usman rose to address the gathering. All were eager to hear what the new Caliph had to say. But the weight of the new responsibility made Usman's body shake. All he could say was, "O people, it is not easy to manage a new horse. There will be several occasions to speak to you. If I live, I will address you some other day. But you know, I am not very good at speech-making."

 

The First Case


The first case that came up before Usman was the case of Obaidullah the second son of Omar. Obaidullah had slain to Persians, Hurmuzan and Jafina. That was because he believed them to be co-plotters with Abu Lolo. Abu Lolo was the murderer of his father.

The evening before Omar was mortally wounded, Abdur Rehman son of Abu Bakr had seen Abu Lolo standing with Hurmuzan and Jafina. The three were whispering to one another. As Abdur Rehman passed by, the three got startled. A double edge dagger had falled on the ground. After his father's death, Obaidullah examined the dagger of the asassin. It answered exactly to the description given by Abdur Rehman. Obaidullah felt sure that Abu Lolo alone was not responsible for killing his father. He flew into a rage and killed the other two partners in the plot.
The case came up before Usman. He put the matter before the leading Companions. Ali said that the evidence of one man was not enough to prove Huramuzan and Jafina guilty. The other Companions differed with this view. Usman found a way out of the difficulty. He himself laid the bloodmoney for the two Persians. As they had no relatives, the Caliph had the legal right to act in their behalf. The decision of Usman was liked by all.
 

Expansion of the Empire

 

The First Directive


The new Caliph issued a directive to all civil and military officers. It said that they should be just in their dealings, honest in money matters and tolerant towards non-Muslims. Further, the officers were told to keep their word, even with the enemy. They were reminded that they were no more than the servants and guardians of the people not their masters and rulers.

Saad bin Waqqas was the Governor of Kufa. He took a loan from the public treasury and foiled to return it in time. The Treasury Officer, Abdullah bin Masud, reported the matter to the Caliph. Usman dismissed Saad bin Waqqas. This was in the year 26 A.H.
 

A Woman Warrior


Azarbaijan and Armenia were conquered during Omar's time. But these provinces were afterwards lost. Both provinces were under the Governor of Kufa. When Saad bin Waqqas was removed from governorship, Azarbaijan rebelled. Usman ordered military action against it and the province was once again under the Muslim flag.

Usman deputed Salmab bin Rabia and Habib bin Muslima to reconqure Armeina. In this campaign Habib's wife also went with him. On day Habib came to know that the commander of the Armenian army was preparing to strike. Habib did not have enough troops, so he decided to carry out a night raid, before the enemy could strike.
Habib's wife saw him put on armour one evening. She asked him what made him buckle on armor at a such late hour. "My goal tonight is the ten of the Armenian commander of the Garden of Paradise," replied the husband. A suddent thought struck the lady. "When should not I share the honor with my husband?" she said to herself. As soon as her husband was gone, she dressed like a soldier and rushed off to the enemy camp.
At the dead of the night Habib carried out his raid. The enemy was taken by complete surprise. Killing the Armenian guard, Habib reached the commander's tent. He was amazed to find his wife already waiting for him at the tent door. She was dressed like a soldier and was fully armed. Together the couple fell on the enemy commander and killed him.
 

Cypress Occupied


Muawia was the Governor of Syria under Usman. Anatolia was still under Byzantium. Skirmishes with the Byzantine troops were common. In the year 26 A.H., Muawia led an army into Anatolia and took the city of Amuria. He wanted to advance, but troop movement by land seemed difficult. So he had to stop short.

Muawia now turned his attention to the Mediterranean. He saw the importance of the islands in this sea and made plans to occupy them.
Muawia had a strong liking for the sea. He foresaw the Islam could not be strong without a powerful navy. During Omar's caliphate he put this plan before the Calpih, but Omar was opposed to sea fighting. He did not think it was wise to risk the lives of Muslims in sea-battles. So he did not approve of Muawia's plan. When Usman became Caliph, Muawia again took up the question of the navy with the Caliph. Usman agreed to Muawia's plan, on condition that no one was to be forced against his will to take part in the naval campaign.
In 28 A.H., Muawia prepared a fleet of ships. The Governor of Egypt joined him with his own fleet. The two fleets jointly invaded Cypress. The people of the island fought bravely but had to give in at last. They made peace with the Muslims. The victors undertook to defend the island. In return they got the right to use the island as a military base.
   
Google
 

Occupation of North Africa


Amr bin As was the first Muslim Governor of Egypt. For some time he continued to be the Governor under Usman. He was replaced by Abdullah bin Sarah, in 25 A.H. Soon there was a rising in Alexandria. Byzantium was at the back of this rising. Usman again sent Amr bin As to Egypt, who put down the rising. After this, Abdulah bin Sarah again took over as Governor of Egypt.

In 26 A.H., the Governor of Egypt got order from the Caliph to advance into North Africa. In Omar's time, Amr bin As had occupied Tripoli. Abdullah bin Sarah was now to march into Tunisia. The Caliph also sent an army from Medina to help his Egyptian governor. This army men included men like Ibn Abbas, Ibn Omar, Ibn Jaafar, Ibn Zubair, Hasan and Hussain. The Caliph wanted to make sure that the North Africa campaign succeeded well. So he went some of the best men to Medina to help Ibn Sarah.
The rising in Alexandria had under lined the need of occupying North Africa. Byzantine bases in North Africa were an ever-present threat to Safety of Egypt. The Caliph decided to remove this threat.
 

A Romantic Story


Abdullah bin Sarah spread his armies in Tripoli. From these military bases he was to strike at the Byzantine forces.

Near the city of Yaquba, Abdullah found his way blocked by a hug Byzantine army. It numbered more than one hundred and twenty thousand. The Muslim army was far smaller.
The battle began. It went on for some days without a clear gain to either side. The Berbers formed the bulk of the Byzantine army. They were fearless fighters. For several days the outcome of the battle seemd to hang in the balance. Seeing this, the Byzantine commander thought of a clever plan. He announced a fat reward for the man who would strike off Abdullah's head. The reward consisted of a hundred thousand pieces of gold and the hand of his beautiful daughter. By killing the Muslim commander, the clever Byzantine general hoped to dampen the spirit of the Muslim troops and win the battle.
This announcement put Abdullah bin Sarah on his guard. He stayed most of the time in his tent. Abdullah bin Zubair noticed this. So he made a counter announcement in the Muslim army. Anyone who would cut off the Byzantine commander's head was to get a hundred thousand pieces of gold and the hand of the beautiful Byzantine princess. Shortly after the announcement the Byzantine commander was slain. His army fled and the Muslims won a complete victory.
Seach now began for the man who had slain the Byzantine commander. However no man came out to claim the reward. At last the beautiful daughter of the Byzantine commander herself identified the man who had slain her father. The hero was none other than Abdullah bin Zubair. The princes was married to him.
The victory cleared the way for the Muslims to advance in North Africa. Muslim troops now spread out in Tunisia and Morocco and occupied important points.
The North African Campaign went on for full fourteen months. During this short period, Muslim armies were able to overrun the whole of North Africa and make it a part of the Arab world.
 

The First Naval Battle


In the year 31 A.H., the Arabs fought their first naval battle. Constantine was now the emperor of Byzantium. He made a daring bid to take back Alexandria. A fleet of 500 ships sailed off to Egypt.

The Muslims got ready to beat back the attack. Muawia's fleet set sail from Syria. Abdullah bin Sarah, the Governor of Egypt, also advanced with the fleet. The two fleets met in mid-sea. Together they sailed on until the enemy fleet was sighted.
A terrible naval battle took place. It was the first experience of sea-fighting for the Arabs. But they found no difficulty in proving their superiority. The sea around was soon cultured with the dead bodies of the Byzantine troops. So much blood flowed that the sea-water became red all around. The Byzantine fleet was crippled. Enemy ships that remained took refuge in the island of Sicily. The Muslim fleet came back victorious.
This fateful sea battle laid the foundation of Muslim sea power. It was to give the Arabs the unchallenged mastery of the seas for long centuries to come. It was not until the beginning of the sixteenth century that the Arabs lost their hold on the seas. And with it the decline of the Muslim world began.
 

Persia and Tabristan


In the years 26 A.H., there was a rising in Persia. The Muslim governor of Basra marched against the rebels. They were defeated and punished. Once again peace and order returned to Persia.

In 30 A.H., the Governor of Kufa lead a huge army to Tabristan. Tabristan was conquered. In the following year there was a rising in Khurusan. It was soon put down.
In 31 A.H., Yezdgird, the former king of Iran, was also killed. He had lost his empire but had not lost hope. He wandered from place to place and created unrest in the frontier districts. It was he who had been the cause of most of the risings in Iran.
His last exploit was a raid on Sistan. With the help of some chiefs of Turkistan, he fell upon Sistan. He was utterly defeated and fled for life. Wandering alone, he sought refuge in a water-mill. The miller did not know him but was tempted by his jewels and rich clothes. So he killed the wretched king and threw his body in the river. Thus ended the wandering career of the last emperor of Iran. With the death of Yezdgird also ended the constant trouble in Iran.
 

The Civil War


Usman's caliphate was marred by a terrible civil war. It led to the murder of the Caliph himself. Usman was a very gentle and soft-hearted man. He often overlooked the faults of others. This made the provincial governors and other officers overbold. Omar's stern hand had stopped his officers from adopting the undemocratic customs and practices of the courts of Iran and Byzantium. Usman's hand proved too weak to do the job. The result was unrest in the provincial capitals. It grew until it engulfed the whole of Islam.

Moreover, Usman was an old man when he took over. Clever people took advantage of his weakening grip on state affairs.
 

Abdullah bin Saba


Abdullah bin Saba, a clever Jew or Yemen, played a leading role in this drama. During Usman's calpihate, he came to Medina, and made a show of becoming a devout Muslim, but he had his own plans. He stayed for some months in Medina and studied things. He saw that Banu Hashim regarded the Caliphate their natural right. They thought that Ali, and not Usman, should have been the Caliph. Abdullah bin Saba determined to make capital out of this.

With great cunning, he set about his task. He made "love of the Holy Prophet and his relatives" his starting-point. Out of this, he spun a clever story. Every Prophet, he said, left behind a "Wasi." The Wasi must be a near relative of the Prophet. Aaron was the Wasi of Moses. In the same way, the Holy Prophet must also have a Wasi, to carry on his mission. Muhammad (peace be upon him) was the last of the Prophets. So, his Wasi, Ali, was the last of the Wasis. Being the Wasi, Ali was the only rightful man to be the Caliph. Usman, therefore had to be removed from the caliphate.
Abdullah bin Saba began to preach his views secretly. He visited important cities in the Muslim empire. In each city, he set up a secret society. He picked up men who lent an easy ear to what he said. These were generally the men who had some real or imaginary complaint against the officers. It was easy to tell these men that the Caliph was the real cause of all trouble.
When the network of secret societies was complete, Abdullah bin Saba set up his headquarters in Egypt. The secret societies rapidly increased their strength. For this they used the following method:
 

1.      Their members made a great show of piety. They posed as the real well wishers of the people.

2.      They invented complaints against Usman and his officers. Some of the complaints were no doubt real. Under cover of these, they also said things that did not exist.

3.      A regular campaign was started against all officers. They were described as irreligions and inefficient.

4.      Forged letters were sent from city to city. These letters talked of injustice and unrest in the city of origin. The Sabaites read out the letters to as many people as possible. Letters were also forged to show that Ali, Talha, Zubair and other noted Companions had full sympathy with the movement. This led people to think that there was widespread unrest and that the leading Companions wanted to remove the Caliph.

 

 

Unrest in Provinces

 

Abu Musa Fired


Abdullah bin Saba's plan worked well. Basra was the capital of one of the provinces. Abu Musa Ashari was its governor. One day Abu Musa gave an address. In it he told the people how, in the early years of Islam, Muslims walked on foot all the way to the field of battle. He went on to explain what great reward such people had found from Allah.

After some days, Abu Musa had to goto a battle-front. He rode on a horse. This produced an uproar against him.
"Look at the Governor!" went round the story, "he says one thing and does another. Why does he go to the battlefield riding on a horse? Why does he not earn a greater reward from Allah by walking on foot?"
The agents of Ibn Saba played with the feelings of people. So much so, that the people get really angry with Abu Musa. A deputation marched to Medina. The Caliph foundh his hands forced to dismiss Abu Musa.
Abdullah bin Amir became the new governor of Basra. The Sabaites started a campaign against him too.
"He is a raw yougn man," they said, "moreover, he is a relative of the Caliph. Usman is filling all key-posts with his kinsmen."
 

Kufa in the Grip of Hooligans


Kufa was the capital of another province. Saad bin Waqqas was its governor. He was the conquerer of Iran. He took a loan out of public funds and could not return it in time. The complaint reached the Caliph and Usman dismissed him.

Saad was replaced by Wali bin Uqba. Walid was a strong man. He took quick action against mischief-mongers. Some of them one night broke into the house of a man. They took away all his money and killed him also. They were all arrested and put to death.
The death of this gang made Sabaites angry. A strong man like Walid bin Uqba was a real danger to them. So they brought a false complaint against him. They said that he was given to drinking. A deputation set off to Medina. Two men bore witness before the Caliph and his advisory council that they had seen their Governor drinking wine. Ali gave the ruling that the man was guilty. So Usman dismissed the Governor.
Walid was replaced by Saad bin As. The new governor received people at his house each night. He sat among them and discussed things with them. Everyone was free to drop in. The Sabaites came to these meetings in large numbers. Gradually, the started creating trouble. One night they came down upon a man and beat him in the presence of the Governor.
The Governor felt humbled. But he also felt helpless. The mischief-mongers were all-powerful. He could not lay hands on them. Things became so unbearable that the people wrote to the Caliph. They begged him to rid the city of the hooligans.
Usman wrote to the governor to send this gang to Muawia, in Syria. He hoped that Muawia would set them right. The Caliph's order was carried out. Muawia treated these people well. He tried to win them over with kindness. They began to be rude to Muawia. So Muawia wrote to the Caliph, telling him that he could do nothing to reform such bad men.
Usman next sent them to Abdur Rehman bin Khalid, the governor of Hims. Abdur Rehman was a stern man. He was really hard on these fellows. This brought them to senses. They repented for what they had done and promised to behave well in the future. Abdur Rehman informed the Caliph about it. Usman wrote back to him, telling him to send the men back to Kufa, if they really meant what they said. But once in Kufa they were as active in mischief-making as ever.
 

The Central Command


Abdullah bin Saba chose Egypt to be the center of his party. He did this for a number of reasons. In the first place, Egypt lay in the middle of the eastern and western wings of the empire. Secondly, Amr bin As, the former governor of Egypt, had been a popular governor. His successor, Abdullah bin Sarah, could not be equally popular. Amr bin As had been removed by Usman. This gave Saba ready ground to whip up discontent among the people. Thirdly, the North African campaign kept the new governor away from Egypt for more than a year. This gave Saba a free hand to work out his plans.

In Egypt Saba also had two powerful allies in Muhammad bin Hudhifa and Muhammad bin Abu Bakr. Both of them were against Usman. The former had been left an orphan and was brought up by Usman. When he grew up, he asked the Caliph to make him the Governor of some province. Usman did not see him fit for so high an office and turned down the request. This made Muhammad bin Hudhifa angry with the Caliph. He came over to Egypt and became active against Usman.
Muhammad bin Abu Bakr was also angry with the Caliph on personal grounds. He had been brought up by Ali. His mother, the widow of Abu Bakr, had married Ali, after the first Caliph's death. Muhammad bin Abu Bakr owed a debt to a certain creditor. He failed to pay back the money in time. The creditor complained to the Caliph. Usman was very impartial in his ruling. This offended Muhammad bin Abu Bakr. So he also came to Egypt and joined hands with the enemies of the Caliph.
Abdullah bin Saba took full advantage of these factors. The central command of the Sabaites in Egypt sent forth a flood of propoganda against Usman. Letters poured into each city, telling stories of the terrible plight of people in other places. Local Sabaite agents gave full publicity to these letters. Before long the people of each city came to think that theirs was the happinest lot. They came to believe that life was unbearable in other parts of the Mulsim empire. And they held the Caliph responsible for this all.
The means of communication being difficult in those days, people had no way of knowing the real truth about life in provinces other than their own. The Sabaites took full advantage of this situation.
 

The Socialist Companion


Since Omar's day, Muawia had been the governor of Syria. Muawia was a very wise and tactful ruler. He knew how to keep the situation in hand. So the Sabaite agents had no success in Syria.

Abu Dhar Ghiffari, a well-known Companion of the Holy Prophet, lived in Syria. He always kept aloof from the affairs of the world and its riches. He held that public income should be spent on the poor the moment it was received. He was against hoarding any money in the public treasury. "Public money is people's money," he said, "and should be spent on people the moment it comes in." Muawia was of a different view. He thought that public income could be kept in the treasury to meet unforseen public needs of the future. He called public money "Allah's money." He said that the ruler, as the agent of Allah, had a right to spend public money as he thought fit. Abu Dhar thought otherwise.
In Syria Saba tried to take advantage of the difference of opinion between the Governor and Abu Dhar, the noted Companion. He went to Abu Dhar and said, "It is strange that Muawia calls public money, 'the money of Allah.' He means there by that people should have no say about the way public money is spent."
Abu Dhar easily fell into the Sabaite trap. He went straight to Muawia and said, "How is it that you call public money the 'money of Allah'?"
 

"Oh Abu Dhar?" replied Muawia mildly, "we are all the servants of Allah. So all our money is Allah's money."

 

The reply did not satisfy Abu Dhar.

 

"All right," siad Muawia, "in future I will call this money public money."

 

Now Abu Dhar raised another point. He preached that the rich had no right to amass wealth. Whatever was over and above their immediate needs, he said, should be given away to the poor. In support of this, he cited the following words of the Qur'an:

 

"They who hoard up gold and silver and spend it not in the way of Allah, tell them of a painful doom on the day when it will all be heated in the fire of hell. Then their foreheads, their flanks and their backs will be branded therwith. Here is what you hoarded for yourselves. Now taste of what you used to hoard."

 

Here again Muawia differed with Abu Dhar. He held that after a man had paid the poor-rate of two and a half percent, he was free to own health.

Abu Dhar's views made a great appeal to the masses. The great majority of people were poor. They wanted to share the comforts of the rich. Abu Dhar's movement began to gain ground rather rapidly.
Muawia wrote about this to Usman. The Caliph wrote back that Abu Dhar be sent to Medina, with all the honor due to him.
In Medina, Abu Dhar started the same movement. Usman called him and said, "O Abu Dhar, I will force people to pay whatever they owe to Allah and His Apostle. In return, I will grant them the rights they have over me. But I can force no one to give up the world."
"Well, then send me out of Medina," said Abu Dhar, "The Prophet of Allah told me to leave Medina when it had expanded up to Salah."
So Usman sent Abu Dhar to a small village away from Medina. He gave him some camels and also two servants to look after him.  
Google
 
 

Other Factors


It is true that Abdullah bin Saba and his men did much to stir up discontent against Usman. But it is equally true that under Usman several things did go wrong. Things were very smooth when Usman took over. In the years that followed, disturbing factors slowly crept in.

Omar did not allow his officers to own property outside their native city. One of his Governors once asked permission to build ahouse in the provincial capital.
"No," replied Omar, "you have a house of your own in Medina. You do not need another as long as this one is there."
This policy of Omar kept the leading families of Islam in the national capital. Usman gave up this policy and allowed people to settle and own property wherever they liked. The result was that the leading families of the Quraish spread out in different cities. There they built up power. This naturally lead to a race for supreme power. Each family tried to outshine all others.
Banu Umayya and Banu Hashim were old rivals. The first two Caliphs, Abu Bakr and Omar, belonged to Banu Umayya. He gave his kinsmen high offices in the State. This offended Banu Hashim and their supporters. In later years, Usman came to depend to much on one of his kinsment. Marwan, who was a very clever man and was disliked by the people.
During Usman's calpihate, the expansion of the Muslim empire almost came to an end. Man who had been kept busy by military campaigns now began to take interest in politics.
Kufa, Basra, Egypt and Syria were important military bases. These bases were mostly in the hands of men who had spent no time in the company of the Holy Prophet. The ultra-democratic spirit of Islam was a thing unknown to them. As soon as Omar's strong hand was gone, these officers went back to old ways of dealing with people. They tried to be the rulers of people, rather than their servants. They tried to have for themselves the same comforts and luxuries as the old rulers of Iran and Byzantium enjoyed.
This created a distance between the rulers and the ruled. There free spirit of Islam got a set-back. Naturally people who knew what equality was felt bitter. And the common man who had tasted of it in full measure during Omar's regime, put the whole blame on the new Calpih.
 

Things take a Serious Turn

 

Conference in Medina


Discontent and unrest went on growing in parts of the empire. At last its effects began to be felt in Medina. All leading Companions pressed the Caliph to do something in the matter. Usman agreed. He wrote to all his Governors to meet him when they came for the Haj of 34 A.H.

The Calpih and the governors met in a conference.
 

"What is the real cause of unrest?" asked Usman.

"It is the doing of the mischief-mongers," they replied. "They throw mud at the Caliph and his officers. They want to overthrow the government."

"How do we put a stop to this?" demanded the Caliph.

 

Different remedies were suggested. But all agreed on one thing. They said that the Calpih should adopt a stern policy towards those who created trouble. To this Usman did not agree. In a spirited speech, he said, addressing his Governors.

 

"I have heard your opinions. I fear this is the evil foretold by the Prophet of Allah. If so, I will do what I can, with all the kindness and forgiveness at my command, to keep its gates shut. I will prove by my deeds that I was not slack in doing good to the people. I will not allow any blame to rest on me when I face Allah tomorrow. I feel sure that the evil time is sure to come. Yet blessed will be Usman if he lays down his life but does not bring the curse nearer."

 

The conference ended. Usman allowed the Governors to leave. Muawia said, "O Commander of the Faithful! I do not think Medina is a safe place for you to live. You better go with me to Syria."

"Even if my head is cut off," replied Usman, "I will not leave Medina. No price can take away from the neighborhood of the Prophet."
"Then allow me to send some troops from Syria," said Muawia, "to serve as your guards."
"No," was the reply. "I do not want that people living in the neighborhood of the Prophet should be put to any trouble on my account."
Then the Caliph sent four men to tour the provincess and report on things. Three of them came back with the report that conditions were normal. Ammar bin Yasir, however, who was sent to Egypt, did not come back. The Governor of Egypt informed the Caliph that Ammar had gone over to the Sabaites.
 

Trouble Begins


The plan of the Caliph's enemies was to cause a general rising when the Governors were away for the conference at Medina. But the plot could not be carried out The hooligans of Kufa, however, did not allow their Governor to enter the city when he came back from the conference. They wanted Abu Musa Ashari to be their Governor. The Calpih granted their request and made Abu Musa the Governor of Kufa.

The hooligans now made another plot. Their ring-leaders, from each province, decided to meet in Medina. They were to study things in the capital and decide upon the future course of action.
Accordingly, the ring-leaders from all provinces met outside Medina. The Calpih came to know of their coming. He sent of them two men whom they trusted. The men came back with an alarming plot. They said the ring-leaders were bent on mischief. Their plan was to go back and tell the people that the Caliph had refused to listen to their complaints. In the following year, they intended to march on Medina at the head of large parties and to kill the Caliph. The Caliph heard the report calmly but did nothing in the matter.
The ring-leaders then entered Medina. The Caliph had been told about their future plans. Some people suggested that they should all be killed. That would dry up the source of mischief, they suggested. But the Caliph replied, "I cannot kill any man without sufficient legal reasons. These people have some misunderstandings. I will try to remove these. I will be kind and forgiving to them and try to bring them to the right path. If kindness fails to work, I shall give myself up to Allah's will.
 

Usman Rebuts Charges


The Caliph then called together the leading men of Medina as well as the ring-leaders who had come from the provinces. He addressed that gathering thus:

 

"It is said I have reserved some pastures for public use. By Allah, I have not reserved any pasture which was not so reserved before me. In these pastures graze the animals that are public property. Moreover, the pastures are open to everybody. Only those were disallowed their use who offered bribes to get more than what was their due. As for my use of these pastures, I have no more than two camels. These camels serve me at the time of Hajj. You all know that before I became Caliph, no one in Arabia had more animals than I.

I have sent authorized copies of the Qur'an in all parts of the empire. There are people who object to this. You all know that the Qur'an is only one book sent down by Allah. The Companions who wrote down this book, under the eyes of the Holy Prophet, are still alive. It is they who compiled the copy which I have sent everywhere.

It is said I have appointed young men as officers. The fact is that it is not age but ability and character that guides my choice. Here are men from the provinces. They cannot deny the ability and honesty of my officers. Young age is no disqualification. The Holy Prophet gave Usama the command of an army, although he was younger than all the men I have appointed.

It is said I gave to the Governor of Egypt the whole booty of North Africa as a reward. The fact is that he was given only one-fifth of the fifth part due to the State. There are examples of such rewards before my time. Anyhow, when I came to know that people objected to it, I took back the money from the Governor.

It is said I love my kinsmen and bestow rewards on them. It is no sin to love one's kinsmen. But this love has never made me unjust to other people. As for rewards, I have never given a kinsmen any thing out of public funds except what was his due. But I do make gifts to my kinsmen out of my own pocket. I spent on them before I became Caliph. Now that I am old and do not hope to live long, I do not wish to keep anything with me. I do not think it right to spend anything on my kinsmen out of public funds. In fact, I do not get anything out of these funds for my own expenses either. The revenue of each province is spent on the people of that province. The public treasury at Medina receives nothing but the fifth part of booty. This money is spent by the people themselves in times of need.

It is said I have given lands to my friends. This is not true. Many people from Medina went with the conquering armies. Some of them settled in the conquered lands. There they acquired pieces of land. Afterward, some of them came back to sell their lands in distant parts of the empire and give them the price therof."

 

The Caliph asked his hearers if these facts were true. All said they were!

It became clear to all present that the charges heaped on the Caliph were false. However, no one suggested a way to clear him in the eyes of the common man of these false charges.
 

Rioters March on Medina


The ring-leaders went back to their provinces. They told people that the Caliph was not willing to set things light. They waited for the next Haj. As the time for Haj came near, they decided to send strong parties from Basra, Kufa and Egypt, seemingly for Haj. From Mecca, these parties were to march on Medina and decided things with the sword.

The Caliph had known about this plot of the mischief-mongers long before. But he did not want to use force against his enemies. He was determined to win them with love or to perish in the attempt.
In the month of Shawwal 35 A.H., rioters set off from Basra, Kufa and Egypt. They left in small parties. They numbered about one thousand from each province. They marched on Medina and encamped some miles away from the city, at three different places. Some of the Egyptians came to Ali and requested him to accept their leadership. He refused. Some men from Basra went to Talha with a similar request and got the same answer. The rioters of Kufa made the same request to Zubair. He too refused to be a party to their evil plans.
 

Ali Sends Rioters Away


Usman came to know what the rioters had in mind. He went to Ali and requested him to use his influence with the mischief-mongers and to sent them away.

"Did I not tell you so often," said Ali, "not to be led by your kinsmen? But you listned to Marwan, Muawia, Ibn Amr, Ibn Abi Sarah, and Saeed bin As. How can I sent back these men now?"
Usman assured Ali that in the future he would be guided by his advice and would not listen to his kinsmen.
"You better say this thing publicly in the mosque," said Ali. "That would make the change in State policy known to everyone. The rioters then will have no excuse to create trouble."
Accordingly, Usman went to the mosque and said in his address: "If I have made any mistakes, I beg Allah's forgiveness. I request all men of insight among you to give me the right advice. By Allah, for the cause of truth, I am ready to obey even a slave. I promise to be led by your wishes. No longer will I listen to Marwan and his men."
Tears flowed down the Caliph's cheeks as he finished the address. The hearers also began to weep.
Ali now went to the Egyptians. He assured them that all their complaints would be removed. They seemed to be satisfied and set off on the road to Egypt. Rioters from Basra and Kufa also marched off to their cities. The storm seemed to have blown over.  
Google
 
 

The Mysterious Letter


Everybody in Medina thought that the trouble had ended. Presently, the streets of the city began to ring with the shouts of the rioters. They trooped aroung the Caliph's house and ringed in on all sides. Loud shouts of "Revenge! Revenge!" rented the air of Medina.

Ali came to the Egyptians and asked why the had come back.
"You assured us," they said, "that our complaints would be removed, but we saw a messenger hurry past ut. We stopped him and searched his person. We found him carrying a letter from the Caliph, ordering the Governor to kill us as soon as we were back. Here is the letter It bears the Caliph's seal. This is a clear breach of faith. The Caliph must suffer for it."
"And what has brought you back?" Ali asked the rioters from Kufa nd Basra.
"We had to help our Egyptian brothers," they said.
"But your roads were so apart. How did you come to know of the letter, after having gone several miles on your roads?"
To this there was no reply.
"It is clear," said Ali, "that you have made a plot. You seem to be bent on putting it through."
"Say what you will," replied the rioters, "we do not want Usman to be the Caliph. Allah had made his blood lawful to us. You too, should help our cause."
"By Allah," replied Ali, "I will have nothing to do with you."
"Then why did you write letters to us?" they demanded.
"What letters?" said Ali in amazement. "By Allah, I never wrote to you anything."
Ali saw that things were beyond his control. The rioters seemed bent on dragging him in as well. Ali saw that his position was becoming difficult. So he left for Ahjaruzzet, a place some miles from Medina.
The rioters showed the letter to the Caliph and said, "Did you pass this death sentence on us?"
"I swear by Allah," replied Usman, "I know nothing about this letter."
 

"Well, then you are not fit to continue as Calpih," roared the rioters. "If you wrote the letter, then you are clearly unfit to be the Caliph. But if someone else wrote it and you know it not, even then you are equally unfit. If such important orders can be sent out without your knowledge, you should not continue as head of the State. We demand that you give up the Caliphate."

 

Usman rejected the demand. "I will not take off with my own hands," he delcared, "the robe of honor which Allah made me put on."

 

The Siege


Seeing that Usman would not part with the Caliphate, the rioters laid siege to his house. For forty days the siege went on. As days went by, the blockade became more tight. Rioters disallowed even the supply of water to reach the aged Caliph.

There were other men inside the house besides the Caliph and his family. Among them were Hasan, Husain, Muhammad bin Talha, Abdullah bin Zubair, Abu Huraira, Marwan and others. These men served as the guards of the Caliph. They had some encounters with the rioters. In these encounters Hasan and Marwan got wounded. Marwan's wounds were serious. But the rioters avoided a pitched battle. They knew that because of Hasan and Husain, men of Banu Hashim would join the fight against them.
It was during the siege that Usman sent Abdullah bin Abbas to Mecca. He was to lead the Haj as the Caliph's deputy. The Caliph also sent messengers to provincial Governors to tell them of the siege.
When the hardship of the siege grew, Mughira bin Shaaba requested the Caliph to do something about it. He put three proposals before him. "Come out of the house," he proposed, "and fight the rioters. You have men with you. The people of Medina will also fight at your side. Moreover, you are in the right truth and must win. Or, leave by the back-door and reach Mecca. The rioters cannot lay hands on you in the holy city. Or, go to Syria. There you will be safe with Muawia to protect you."
To this Usman replied, "I do not agree to the first proposal because I do not want to be the first Caliph to shed the blood of Muslims. I do not accept the second proposal either. This is because I do not want to become a danger to the holy city of Mecca. The third proposal is also unnacceptable. At no price will I give up the neighborhood of the Prophet."
Things were getting worse every day, but Usman was bent upon fighting evil with love, even though it cost him his life.
 

Usman Murdered


Usman made use of only one weapon. It was his kind and soft words. He went to the roof of his house several times and spoke to the rioters. He told them how close he had been to the Holy Prophet. He reminded them what services he had rendered to Islam. But his words fell on deaf ears. Nothing could stop the rioters from mischief.

As the day of Haj grew near, the rioters' anxiety grew. In a few days hundreds of men would be back from Haj, they knew. Help from provinces might also arrive. They had to put through their plot without delay or it would be too late. They had to act quickly.
Usman's house was very big. Hasan, Husain, Muhammad bin Talha and Abdullah bin Zubair stood guard at the main gate. The rioters had no wish to cross swords with these men. That would draw the kinsmen of these men into the fight. To avoid this, a part of rioters stealthily jumped over the backwall of the house, and rushed towards where the aged Caliph was. The guards at the main gate knew nothing about what was going on inside.
Usman was sitting with the Holy Book open before him. He was reciting the Qur'an. Muhammad bin Abu Bakr was leading the party of assassins. He got hold of the Caliph's beard and pulled it.
"My dear nephew," said Usman, looking into Muhammad's eyes, "if your father had been alive, he would not have liked this conduct of yours."
The young man was cut to the quick and turned back.
Then another another man hit the Caliph on the head with an axe. The third struck him with a sword. Naila, the faithful wife of Usman, had her fingers cut off in trying to shield her husband. Then all the rioters fell upon the aged Caliph. They inflicted several wounds on his body. One of them, Amr bin Hamq by name, cut off his head.
The news of Usman's cruel murder came as a rude shock to everybody. Ali was stunned when he heard of it. He rushed to Medina.
"Where were you?" he rebuked his sons, Hasan and Husain, "when the Commander of the Faithful was murdered?"
Similarly, he was angry with Abdullah bin Zubair and others who stood guard at the gate.
Usman was murdered on Friday, the 17th of Dhul Hijja, 35 A.H.
After killing the Caliph, the rioters plundered his house. Then they rushed to the public treasury and looted it. Horror-stricken people looked on the orgy from behind closed doors. No one dared to call a halt to it. Medina seemed to be at the mercy of the rioters. For three days, Usman's dead body lay unburied. Rioters would not allow anyone to bury it. At last some people went to Ali and spoke to him about the matter. At Ali's request, the rioters allowed the burial. Late in the evening, seventeen men carried the dead body to the graveyard of Medina and buried it there.
Such was the end of Usman, the apostle of love and peace. He wanted to prevent blood-shed at all costs. He did his utmost to counter trickery and violence with love and kindness. The attempt failed. Usman had to pay with his own life for this failure.
 

Twelve Years of Usman's Caliphate


Usman was Caliph for about twelve years. Compared with the caliphate of Omar, this period looks desolate. The end of the period saw the forces of lawlessness get the upper hand. But Usman was not much to blame for this.

Omar's period was a period of conquests. In the wake of conquests came a flood of riches. Omar himself once wept when he saw a heap of riches lying in the Prophet's Mosque. Asked why he wept, he had said that riches always brought with them jealosy and malice and these were the real seeds of disunity. Omar was perfectly right. His fears came true in the years that followed his death.
The holy Prophet, too, had foretold a period of great unrest. This period was to accompany the prosperity of his people. He awoke one night greatly disturbed. He looked agitated and said, "Glory be to Allah! What great treasures He has given my people! And what an unrest has come down upon the people in the wake of the treasures!"
From the beginning of the unrest, Usman felt sure that the terrible unrest foretold by the Prophet was at hand. The calamity he thought, was inevitable and must come down. He could delay it, but could not stop it. Firm and strong action, he believed, would bring it nearer. So he tried to delay the onset of unrest with kindness and forgiveness. These were the weapons on which he relied. If they did not work, the fault was not Usman's. It was the fault of men who could not see right from wrong.
Usman also had another prophecy of the Prophet constantly in mind. It said, "When the sword is once out among my followers, it will be three till the Last Day."
There had been two Caliphs before Usman. Their swords fought the enemies of Islam. They never led an army against the Muslims. Here were Muslims up in arms against Usman. Should he draw his sword against them? He could easily do this. The rioters were no more than three thousand in number. Medina had beaten back much larger armies. If only Usman had drawn his sword, there must have been hundreds of swords to fight for him. In fact, he could have obtained troops from Syria well in time to crush any number of rioters. But nothing could induce Usman to make use of the sword. That would have made him the first Caliph of Islam to shed the blood of Muslims. The sword once out would always be there. And Usman was the last person to let loose a curse that would hanve over the Muslims for ever. It was far easier for him to lay down his life. So he chose the easier course. He gave his life so that his people might be saved the terrible curse of the sword.
"Usman is the most modest of my Companions," once said the Holy Prophet. His modesty did not leave Usman even after he was the ruler of a big empire. He was generous and soft-hearted. He was always inclined to overlook people's faults. High virtues indeed! But as the head of a big State, Usman needed to be something more. He needed to be strong, firm and prompt. However, Usman's heart would not allow him to follow the course of firmness. He knew full well where the path of love was going to lead and gladly paid the price with his life.
Since Usman, was kind to all people, he was all the more kind to his kinsmen. Some of them took undue advantage of this thing. They made a bid to gather all power into their hands. Many of the key-posts in the empire came to be filled by them of by their friends. Marwan got such a hold on the old Caliph that he sometimes acted in his name without telling him what he was doing. The Caliph came in for criticism for the doings of Marwan.
The courage and faith showed by Usman have few parallels in history. He prized the neighborhood of the Prophet over all things - even his life. Nothing could drive him away from Medina, where the Prophet lay in eternal rest. Death started him in the face but he welcomed the death that would send him to a grave in Medina. This death was far more precious to Usman than life elsewhere. That explains the courage with which he met his death.
Despite internal troubles, Usman's Caliphate did see expansion of the empire. North Africa was added to it. Risings in different parts were quickly put down. Byzantium was not allowed to take advantage of the internal troubles of Islam.
At bottom, Usman's murder was the result of political differences. A party of men wanted to remove him from the Caliphate. They wanted to see another man as the Caliph. But the method they used to bring this about was unfortunate. HItherto Caliphs had been chosen by the general vote of the people. The Companions were the leaders of public opinion. It were they who by a majority vote decided who should be the Caliph. The rioters of Egypt, Kufa and Basra did away with this tradition. They made the sword the deciding factor.
Their method of violence produced another unfortunate result. Political parties soon hardened into religious groups. These groups were further subdivided. This dealt a sever blow to the unity of Muslims. The sects came to stay. That which the Prophet had foretold did come to pass! The sword was out among his followers and it had come to stay!
Usman did a great service to Islam by sending out standard copies of the Qur'an to provincial capitals. The need arose from a dispute about the way of reciting the Holy Qur'an. People of Iraq recited it one way and the people of Syria in another way. The matter came up before the Caliph in 30 A.H.
 

"We copy the way of Abu Musa Ashari," said the Iraqis.

"And we follow the way of Miqdad bin al-Aswad," declared the Syrians.

 

Usman put the matter before the Companions. All agreed that the copy prepared in Abu Bakr's time was the standard one. After Abu Bakr, it had passed into the hands of Omar, and now it was with his daughter, Hafsa. Usman got this copy. Zahid bin Thabit, the trusted scribe of the revelation, was asked to prepare seven copies from it. He was to be helped by three more men, who had the Qur'an by heart.

Zaid himself had the whole Qur'an by heart. He was also one of the scribes of the revelation. First, he wrote out the whole book from memory. Then he read it out to a gathering of Muhajirun and Ansar three times. Then he compared this copy with the one that was with Hafsa. The two copies were exactly alike. Seven more copies were then written out and sent to different parts of the country.
A word here may be said about relations between Usman and Ali. It is true that Ali disagreed with the aged Caliph on many points. He particularly disliked the man who acted in his name. All the same, Ali did nothing that might have harmed Usman. He advised him to get rid of Marwan and other Omayyads. But he also pleaded with the rioters to give up mischief. He flatly refused to help their evil cause in any way.
When Ali came to know that the rioters had cut off the water supply of the Caliph, he went to them and said, "O people. you are doing an evil thing. Such an act does not befit Muslims. Even non-Muslims do not do this. Why do you cut off the food and water supply of Usman? When the Iranians and the Christians take someone a prisoner, they give him food and water. What harm had Usman done to you? Why have you beseiged him?? Why are you sent on taking his life?"
These words had no effect on the rioters. Seeing this, Ali threw his turbon in Usman's house. He wanted the Caliph to know that he did come to plead with the rioters but could not succeed.
Usman knew that Ali was sincere. He never said a word of complaint against Ali. All he said was that Ali should have been more active in his support. But for this lukewarmness, Ali had reasons. He believed that all trouble was due to Usman's advisors. He wanted them to go. The rioters made the same demand. Usman assured Ali that he would dismiss these men. He said so publicly in the Mosque. This removed all misunderstanding between the two sons in-law of the holy Prophet. They were once again as close to each other as ever.
But nothing could have been more hateful to the rioters. Throughout they had been using Ali's name to fan the fire of discontent. How could they see him stand by the side of the Caliph? So they forged the fateful letter. That letter put both Usman and Ali in awkward positions. It gave the rioters a good excuse to go ahead with their evil plans. They simply refused to listen to Ali. Ali felt helpless. In the face of the mysterious letter, he could do nothing. So he left the city. However, he ordered his sons to stand guard at the gate of the Caliph.
The most remarkable thing about Usman is his faith. He had heard the Prophet say that civil war, when once touched off, would know no end. Usman did not want to be the man to touch it off. He would allow no one to draw sword for his sake. On the last day of his life, there was a fighting between the rioters and the guards at the gate. The rioters wanted to force an entry into the house. The sons of Ali, Zubaid and Talha put up a stiff fight. Usman came to know of it.
 

"No," he exclaimed, "I do not want to spill the blood of Muslims, to save my own neck."

 

Saying this, he sent them all home. If civil war could be stopped at the cost of his life, Usman was most happy to pay that price. He believed that by laying down his life he could delay the advent of the cursed sword foretold by the Prophet (peace be upon him). So he would neither use sword to hit back, nor flee from the city of the Prophet. He willingly died that Islam might live. For a great cause and a great conviction, he made the greatest sacrifice a man can possibly make. Thus he joined the ranks of the great martyrs of all time.  

 


Courtesy:http://www.islamicmiracles.net/Hazrat_Usman_bin_Affaan.htm



__._,_.___


__,_._,___

Comments

News

Loading...

Six C's of Character - Yasir Fazaga